^^ Just can't see what evidence there would be other than "she said, he said"?
Maybe more a case of just wanting it all to be over?
Well he's admitted it now so all the "where's the evidence" peado brigade can do one![]()
How on EARTH can you prosecute someone for something like this that happened years ago?
What POSSIBLE evidence would anybody have?
Just someones word against yours. Its completely ridiculous.
Its like a reverse minority report.. for past crimes.
How on EARTH can you prosecute someone for something like this that happened years ago?
What POSSIBLE evidence would anybody have?
Just someones word against yours. Its completely ridiculous.
Its like a reverse minority report.. for past crimes.
BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall has admitted 14 charges of indecently assaulting girls including one aged nine.
The 83-year-old of Wilmslow, Cheshire, pleaded guilty at Preston Crown Court to the offences, involving 13 victims, which occurred between 1967 and 1985.
Three charges of indecent assault and one of rape will lie on the court file.
His lawyer said Hall apologised to his victims and added: "He is all too aware that his disgrace is complete."
what is it lately with all these kiddy fiddlers flying around?
It's the legacy of an era which turned a blind eye.
Both he and Ken Barlow live in Wilmslow so why are they under the jurisdiction of Lancashire Constabulary and not Cheshire?
The offences were committed in Lancashire I assume.
I would have thought that Cheshire Police would make the initial arrest following a request from another police force. That police force would then send officers to transport him down to their force area for interrogation. I'm not a police officer but that is my guess from years of watching The Bill.Ah, is that how it works? Seems a bit daft. If he had done it in Cornwall, they'd have officers traipsing up all the way up to Cheshire to arrest him?
I'm not a police officer but that is my guess from years of watching The Bill.![]()