Hi,
I'm going to be getting myself a little home server of some description soon (either HP Microserver or a self build one) to perform file serving, media streaming, backup duties etc. It'll be running WHS2011 and probably StableBit Drivepool and I'm looking into what drives to buy. I see the WD Red drives are marketed as NAS drives, suitable for 24/7 operation but they are a fair bit more expensive than 'normal' drives. I'm expeccting the server to be on 24/7 but it's very unlikely to actually be constantly working and serving files. Are the Reds really that much more reliable than other drives and even if they are, would a combination of folder level redundancy from DrivePool and regular backups to other/external drives mitigate the risk of drive failure for a home environment?
Many Thanks,
Ross
I'm going to be getting myself a little home server of some description soon (either HP Microserver or a self build one) to perform file serving, media streaming, backup duties etc. It'll be running WHS2011 and probably StableBit Drivepool and I'm looking into what drives to buy. I see the WD Red drives are marketed as NAS drives, suitable for 24/7 operation but they are a fair bit more expensive than 'normal' drives. I'm expeccting the server to be on 24/7 but it's very unlikely to actually be constantly working and serving files. Are the Reds really that much more reliable than other drives and even if they are, would a combination of folder level redundancy from DrivePool and regular backups to other/external drives mitigate the risk of drive failure for a home environment?
Many Thanks,
Ross