Does UKIP have any longevity in politics?

What is your definition of "full" based on? We have a population density lower than Belgium and only slightly higher than Germany.



On your first point. yes Farage comes across as human but he is a slippery snake the same as the rest of them. Look at how he's wriggled about over flat tax this week. He doesn't have a workable policy, he doesn't know what's going on, but he's clever enough to bring the argument back to the EU and immigration every time. I agree that it's a failing of the other party leaders not to address him front on on other issues but it doesn't make him a genuinely nice guy, it just means he's better at "it" than they are!

On your second point, yes the UK did "survive" but it was also very nearly destroyed by two World Wars, not to mention the Napoleonic and Cold War. I think the major thing that people keep forgetting is that we haven't had a war in Europe for decades, something which had been unheard of for the last 1000 years. Now I know I can't prove that it is thanks to the EU but you can certainly argued that cooperation, understanding and economic unity has certainly played a part in ensuring peace.

Britain in the past also existed at a time when we had been the first to industrialise and the rest of the world was a basket case. Right now India and China are overtaking us and the BRIC countries aren't far behind. Britain and the individual countries in Europe just cannot stand alone.

edit, sorry i click quote and thought this was reply to my post.my definition of full is based on the number of un-emplyed and young un-employed. The jobs just arent there, when the economy recovers then immigration numbers can increase, but britian economy is in very bad shape right now and just cannot handle mass migration of un-skilled labour.

in response;
At the present there is no doubt that ukip have very under developed policies on many issues. They are campaigning on very specific issues and their survival will no doubt depend on there ability to develop those broader policies if the party continues to grow. But they are still very young party comparitvely so its not surprising they dont have mature manifesto.
As for him being a snake, what can I say i dont know personally any of the party leaders (or hell any politician full stop). But when I see him put across his views, the pragmatic common sense attitude resonates with many people, and i feel that he is nothing like the serial liars that dominate politics for many years.

honestly what can i say about your second point, I really dont agree, I dont think the eu has contributed even slightly to peace in europe. Ironically look at what happening in greece when the troika come in. You go ask what average greek person thinks of europe..... from my view the eu is literally causing hatred between member states. When people in cyprus protest with merkel/nazi placards, you tell me this is good for peace in europe.

on third point honestly just turn on the telly and see the state of the eu, you think that can compete with brics? , they put interest rate at 0.5, even the germans say they would rather raise interest rates, it is tearing itself apart. We supposed to have free trade with europe not political union.
 
Last edited:
We're in a recession and that is why there are is high unemployment.

Hard times trigger unnecessary hate. Stop blaming immigration.

im sorry but you tell me where in my post i blame immigration for the recession?
The cause of the recession is one thing, how we handle it is another.
Quite simply when there is not enough work to accommodate the present population, then it is only common sense imo that we drastically reduce the number of migrant workers coming into the country until the economy recovers and there is more jobs available.
 
Our government should force everybody into work, making sure it's better than being on the dole at least. Then they can bring in some Asians to clean our toilets and not the other way around.
 
CBB to read the thread but wrt the OP. No, not without radical change. At the moment UKIP is essentially the Nigel Farage anti-EU party. That's how it's known to the majority of people that don't spend the time to research, this is well over 80% of the population. I think that is why they are doing well at the moment, people haven't realised there is a lot more to the party, they have a lot more policies which are complete tosh. Once they start getting more mainstream they are going to start getting picked to pieces by various sides of the media just as happens to liblabcon and I'm not sure UKIP can survive that as the party is truly flawed when it comes to homeland policies.
 
im sorry but you tell me where in my post i blame immigration for the recession?
The cause of the recession is one thing, how we handle it is another.
Quite simply when there is not enough work to accommodate the present population, then it is only common sense imo that we drastically reduce the number of migrant workers coming into the country until the economy recovers and there is more jobs available.

Erm, show me where I said you did?

[TW]Fox;24225847 said:
No, we are not.



Well no, see above.

Ok, strictly speak we're not but you know what I mean.

Unemployment rates are not because of immigration.
 
We're in a recession and that is why there are is high unemployment.

Hard times trigger unnecessary hate. Stop blaming immigration.

And keep letting them in isn't going to get us out of it.

We need to say no more until we have sorted this country out & then make it very difficult to come here.
 
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind - Albert Einstein

I live in Leicester and see this all the time, I've been told on a number of occasions I'm in the wrong area and told to **** off.

You're right on UKIP with the poor though, at the moment.
UKIP have disgusting policies on social issues, equal rights, the disabled & the poor - the party would send the UK back 100 years in social progress & further enrich the top earners in the UK at the expense of everyone else.

To attempt get into power they will tap into the vast resource of stupidity, fear, xenophobia & ignorance which the UK has in abundance.
 
Last edited:
I suggest you dig up some reliable statistics before you make your conclusions, I seem to remember reading a few times that immigrants were good for the economy and also that our unemployment benefits are only average compared to most of the EU. And how many jobs are out there, there are actually quite a lot, probably native Brits won't take many of them though.

As for the EU, both the Labour party and Tories have a good policy on this, there both Eurosceptic, neither party want full integration and to adopt the Euro.

A lot of people seem to have a low opinion of immigrants, most want to work hard and most will start at lower level jobs and work their way up. I hear nothing but what good reliable workers they are for example.

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/alex-massie/2013/02/the-myth-of-the-immigrant-benefit-scrounger/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...booming-how-many-more-people-can-we-take.html
 
Last edited:
Erm, show me where I said you did?

ok so you said
"We're in a recession and that is why there are is high unemployment.

Hard times trigger unnecessary hate. Stop blaming immigration."

so tell me where I blame immigration for high un-emplyment?
 
so tell me where I blame immigration for high un-emplyment?

Ok.

"3. They have common sense policy to immigration.
I really take offence to any suggestion i am racist because I believe the immigration in this country is out of control. There are so many unemployed in this country, we just plain and simple dont have enough jobs to accommodate increased number of unskilled labour workers. Its just a simple fact.
I am idealist i really watch the news and wish for a better world, there is so much misery in other countries and for many a better life can be found in the uk. But surely SURELY people can admit there has to be a limit to how much additional population any country can receive before it negatively impacts local economy. WHY IS IT RACIST TO THINK THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"

im sorry but you tell me where in my post i blame immigration for the recession?

I didn't say you did. Though....

"But surely SURELY people can admit there has to be a limit to how much additional population any country can receive before it negatively impacts local economy. WHY IS IT RACIST TO THINK THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"
 
Ok.

"3. They have common sense policy to immigration.
I really take offence to any suggestion i am racist because I believe the immigration in this country is out of control. There are so many unemployed in this country, we just plain and simple dont have enough jobs to accommodate increased number of unskilled labour workers. Its just a simple fact.
I am idealist i really watch the news and wish for a better world, there is so much misery in other countries and for many a better life can be found in the uk. But surely SURELY people can admit there has to be a limit to how much additional population any country can receive before it negatively impacts local economy. WHY IS IT RACIST TO THINK THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"



I didn't say you did. Though....

"But surely SURELY people can admit there has to be a limit to how much additional population any country can receive before it negatively impacts local economy. WHY IS IT RACIST TO THINK THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"

so basically you cannot read?

no where in those quotes do i attribute the un-employment levels to high immigration....

my point is this;
when there is high unemployment (ie now), the amount of migrating workers allowed into the country should be reduced. Why is it so hard to grasp the point i am making?
 
so basically you cannot read?

no where in those quotes do i attribute the un-employment levels to high immigration....

my point is this;
when there is high unemployment (ie now), the amount of migrating workers allowed into the country should be reduced. Why is it so hard to grasp the point i am making?

Because too many people live a blinkered life or are to stubborn to admit when they are wrong
 
so basically you cannot read?

no where in those quotes do i attribute the un-employment levels to high immigration....

my point is this;
when there is high unemployment (ie now), the amount of migrating workers allowed into the country should be reduced. Why is it so hard to grasp the point i am making?


Not really, it's population growth, primarily through immigration that creates demand and jobs and hence boosts the economy, the real problem is the most of the banks went virtually bust and had to be bailed out with public money, the banks generally don't want to lend and people are afraid to spend and hence save this is the main reason for a recession. What we should be doing is creating an immigration system like Australia has, making sure the workers have appropriate skills/qualities to work here, and if not we should be exporting our services to these countries to give them these attributes.

It the big investment banks short term gambling and massive bonus culture that are to blame more than anything, the lack of financial regulation. The real issue is that the financial services sector is like the Holy Grail to the Government as it's generates about 75% of GDP and thus they applies a 'light touch' regulation which did indeed cause it to boom, but due to all the gambling and greed it all came crashing down.

Your right in saying though it's only human nature to look for someone to blame when the going gets tough, the poor, the immigrants etc etc.
 
All I would like to see is someone in power who had balls to stand up and say this is what we are going to do.
Take trying to get people out of this country who shouldn't be here. When the court of European human rights so you can't do this, tell them up yours we are going to do it.
When prisoners claim for slipping over or they don't like the food, same again up yours this is how it it. If you don't like it then don't commit crimes that send you to prison.
This country is a soft touch cause of all the do gooders. Oh you can't do that they wont like it. You cant do this it will offend them.
Oarlocks grow some balls
 
All I would like to see is someone in power who had balls to stand up and say this is what we are going to do.
Take trying to get people out of this country who shouldn't be here. When the court of European human rights so you can't do this, tell them up yours we are going to do it.
When prisoners claim for slipping over or they don't like the food, same again up yours this is how it it. If you don't like it then don't commit crimes that send you to prison.
This country is a soft touch cause of all the do gooders. Oh you can't do that they wont like it. You cant do this it will offend them.
Oarlocks grow some balls

But aren't a lot of the laws that these people break made up by the EU in the first place? Personally I don't see why anyone would care if a prisoner has a tv and xbox, they're in prison with other prisoners, no matter how many xboxes they have it's still not going to be fun. Even in porrige they had playing cards, that was the xbox equivalent back in those days, did anyone ever say prisoners shouldn't have playing cards?
 
But aren't a lot of the laws that these people break made up by the EU in the first place? Personally I don't see why anyone would care if a prisoner has a tv and xbox, they're in prison with other prisoners, no matter how many xboxes they have it's still not going to be fun. Even in porrige they had playing cards, that was the xbox equivalent back in those days, did anyone ever say prisoners shouldn't have playing cards?

cards are cards - xbox's are expensive.

It's a luxury item.
 
cards are cards - xbox's are expensive.

It's a luxury item.

But compared to other government expenditure it pales into insignificance.

I just fail to see how inflicting pain (through deprivation techniques or otherwise) on a human will work. When training a dog it is far better to train through the practice of rewarding good behavior, rather than simply reprimanding bad behavior. Why would the opposite work on a human, a species that has a greater intellect than a dog?

edit-if you're seriously suggesting criminals have a better quality of life inside prison than out then I think the prison system is not the one in question, but rather our social obligations to the poorest in the country.
 
Last edited:
If you have ever lived outside of the EU you should know that the UK is packed tighter then sardines in a can.

I have spent a year living in Japan, trust me you don't know what a packed sardine looks like. :p

Yes of course we are more populated than the USA or Australia, but that does not mean "we are full". In fact when you get out of the South East of England it becomes very sparse indeed.

Take this article for example http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18623096

"The urban landscape accounts for 10.6% of England, 1.9% of Scotland, 3.6% of Northern Ireland and 4.1% of Wales;" even less than "woodland [which] is now calculated to cover 12.7% of the UK."

So based on actual space we are clearly not "full".

Public services are another matter but I would argue that even these are not necessarily "full". If they were full, the NHS would largely be overburdened due to an ageing native population, not due to a generally younger migrant population and certainly not due to the immigration of the last 10 years.

edit, sorry i click quote and thought this was reply to my post.my definition of full is based on the number of un-emplyed and young un-employed. The jobs just arent there, when the economy recovers then immigration numbers can increase, but britian economy is in very bad shape right now and just cannot handle mass migration of un-skilled labour.

The jobs are there though, especially for unskilled labour. In fact immigrants often do the work that native Britons refuse to do, such as farm labouring. I agree that the country does not need more unemployed people but if you actually look at the figures immigration does not worsen unemployment Telegraph nor are migrants more likely to be on benefits Guardian.

in response;
At the present there is no doubt that ukip have very under developed policies on many issues. They are campaigning on very specific issues and their survival will no doubt depend on there ability to develop those broader policies if the party continues to grow. But they are still very young party comparitvely so its not surprising they dont have mature manifesto.

Well they have existed since 1993 - quite long enough to come up with something credible in my opinion. I think it's also unforgivable not to have a properly formed policy on the economy, it's not like this is some sort of vague fringe issue!

As for him being a snake, what can I say i dont know personally any of the party leaders (or hell any politician full stop). But when I see him put across his views, the pragmatic common sense attitude resonates with many people, and i feel that he is nothing like the serial liars that dominate politics for many years.
You say you don't know any politicians so how can you say they are all liars all the time?

honestly what can i say about your second point, I really dont agree, I dont think the eu has contributed even slightly to peace in europe. Ironically look at what happening in greece when the troika come in. You go ask what average greek person thinks of europe..... from my view the eu is literally causing hatred between member states. When people in cyprus protest with merkel/nazi placards, you tell me this is good for peace in europe.

Yes the EU is going through a crisis at the minute, of course that is going to strain relations but I don't think knocking the entire 50 year project based on the last year or two is really representative or proves anything. Even with the strong resentment towards the EU there haven't been open hostilities or bombings of any sort. Must mean something, no?

on third point honestly just turn on the telly and see the state of the eu, you think that can compete with brics? , they put interest rate at 0.5, even the germans say they would rather raise interest rates, it is tearing itself apart. We supposed to have free trade with europe not political union.

Again, we are going through a massive crisis which has damaged the entire world. Yes Europe has been worse affected than other nations but that is largely the nature of the problem. Firstly being a main financial centre it was always going to be hit hard by a financial crisis. And secondly European nations did overstretch themselves with their debt levels. This does not mean Europe will never recover. Together we are the largest trading bloc in the world with a massive market for goods and services.

How can you legitimise economic union without political influence? If we were having trade policies thrown at us without having a say you'd be moaning we were underrepresented!
 
Back
Top Bottom