Angelina Jolie has double mastectomy

It disappoints me that people get so fascinated with celeb news.

Regardless of this topic, how is this any different to the 2000s to the 90s and 80s? and all those shop stands full of celebrity magazines? now it's in technology. In the next decade somebody else will be saying the same thing as yourself and the decade after that.

Even news channels no longer feel like news channels. Feels like celebrity news, gossip, trivia channels. I think it is beyond feels now, it being it is.


Celebrities are the ones that sets trends after all.
 
Last edited:
I read it. I'm just surprised you think people would actually be bothered by it.

That being said, I can't see her being in another Tomb Raider film anyway, if they decide to follow the style of the new game they'll find someone younger and prettier.

Because cancer or not, she just had both breasts removed. Don't know about you but when I watch ironman, spiderman or any other superhuman characters, I want reality suspended while I completely believe in the powers of the actor I'm watching. Not thinking, oh that's angelina jolie who had her breasts removed, reminding me of cancer and feeling sorry for her. That would break the suspension of disbelief for me. If there was a comedienne you normally find funny (a rare thing) and then you saw her doing comedy after a double mastectomy, do you think you'd laugh much or just be feeling sorry for her?
 
I remember that lass getting her chest tattoed after having this same operation, pretty bold move and very brave to show it off.

After reconstructive surgery for Jolie, I wonder how they deal with blood supply.
 
Because cancer or not, she just had both breasts removed. Don't know about you but when I watch ironman, spiderman or any other superhuman characters, I want reality suspended while I completely believe in the powers of the actor I'm watching. Not thinking, oh that's angelina jolie who had her breasts removed, reminding me of cancer and feeling sorry for her. That would break the suspension of disbelief for me. If there was a comedienne you normally find funny (a rare thing) and then you saw her doing comedy after a double mastectomy, do you think you'd laugh much or just be feeling sorry for her?
Got to ask but do people actually believe this view? Is the majority that shallow/stupid?

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Because cancer or not, she just had both breasts removed. Don't know about you but when I watch ironman, spiderman or any other superhuman characters, I want reality suspended while I completely believe in the powers of the actor I'm watching. Not thinking, oh that's angelina jolie who had her breasts removed, reminding me of cancer and feeling sorry for her. That would break the suspension of disbelief for me. If there was a comedienne you normally find funny (a rare thing) and then you saw her doing comedy after a double mastectomy, do you think you'd laugh much or just be feeling sorry for her?

It wouldn't bother me at all in either case, why would it? Quite why you'd be sat there "feeling sorry for her", I don't know. Fairly sure the last thing anyone wants or needs in these situations is pity.
 
Regardless of this topic, how is this any different to the 2000s to the 90s and 80s? and all those shop stands full of celebrity magazines? now it's in technology. In the next decade somebody else will be saying the same thing as yourself and the decade after that.

Even news channels no longer feel like news channels. Feels like celebrity news, gossip, trivia channels. I think it is beyond feels now, it being it is.


Celebrities are the ones that sets trends after all.

It isn't any different at all, you're correct. I didn't say it was.
 
Because cancer or not, she just had both breasts removed. Don't know about you but when I watch ironman, spiderman or any other superhuman characters, I want reality suspended while I completely believe in the powers of the actor I'm watching. Not thinking, oh that's angelina jolie who had her breasts removed, reminding me of cancer and feeling sorry for her. That would break the suspension of disbelief for me. If there was a comedienne you normally find funny (a rare thing) and then you saw her doing comedy after a double mastectomy, do you think you'd laugh much or just be feeling sorry for her?

Your mind works in a strange strange way.

Do you watch Back to the Future and start feeling pity because Michael J Fox has Parkinson's now?

Did you find you just couldn't take Die Another Day seriously because you were too upset that Halle Berry suffers from Diabetes?

The Matrix must have been pretty hard to keep track of too, given you must have been completely distracted by Hugo Weaving's epilepsy?
 
I feel this thread should turn in to a celebration of Angelina Jolie and her body, let the pictures flow guys



Angelina_Jolie_80.jpg
 
Last edited:
hmm.


woman has breasts removes. Chance of developing cancer drops to very small levels from almost certainty. Woman then gets implants.

Traumatic, but win? sounds like a fine decision to me, as distressing as it must have been.
 
Shame for her.

must have been a very difficult decision to make

Don't think it would be that difficult, the decision that is. 86% chance of a nasty death from cancer reduced to 5% chance means the operation is kind of a no brainer for someone in her position, already in a stable relationship, with kids etc.. and with the resources she has....

Tough ordeal going through the operations though... and kudos to her for raising awareness too.
 
hmm.


woman has breasts removes. Chance of developing cancer drops to very small levels from almost certainty. Woman then gets implants.

Traumatic, but win? sounds like a fine decision to me, as distressing as it must have been.

Breasts are a huge part of a woman's identity (no pun intended!), so it must have been one hell of a decision. (or maybe not.. who knows how she came about to deciding). I did ask early about blood supply (for skin really), if she had implants after re-constructive surgery... how would that work, given there is no tissue? Would certainly be interesting to know how the heck they would achieve that. With the breasts removed and nothing there, the skin would be against the body, hence blood supply, but with implants and very little tissue.... well, that would be exceptionally hard to do I'd imagine.

(^^ I worded that whole thing horribly, I'm not going to rewrite it)
 
Your mind works in a strange strange way.

Do you watch Back to the Future and start feeling pity because Michael J Fox has Parkinson's now?

Did you find you just couldn't take Die Another Day seriously because you were too upset that Halle Berry suffers from Diabetes?

The Matrix must have been pretty hard to keep track of too, given you must have been completely distracted by Hugo Weaving's epilepsy?

And don't even mention Christopher Reeves playing Superman.
 
Well yes, my mind does work in mysterious ways. Ok then, perhaps it's only me who thinks this way. :p Oddly enough, I can watch old movies like back to the future and superman with no problem. I can watch the old tomb raider movies with no problem. But if it was a new movie with AJ and actually made after this operation (I know she decided to quit doing Lara ages ago anyway), then it would feel different to me. I don't really know why.
 
Nowhere did I say she didn't make a good choice for her. I just can't understand it. I personally wouldnt take the test or get a double masectomy even if it was certain thing. Its a personal decision.

I'm glad she is raising awareness for breast cancer but I do think its important to remember that she could die from an equally horrible cancer that they can't test for yet.

She still had a 13% chance not to get it, now she has a 95% of not getting it, reducing the risk does not eliminate it.

Put it this way..

20 years ago my nan had a mastectomy because of a cancerous growth. The procedure at the time was a success.

Now unfortunately we lost her suddenly in January this year where the cancer had reoccurred in the bones without anyone knowing, but without that mastectomy we'd have lost her 20 years previous..

Like you say it's a personal decision but if you knew that a preventitive treatment would most likely significantly increase the chances of many more years with your loved ones you'd take it wouldn't you?
 
Well yes, my mind does work in mysterious ways. Ok then, perhaps it's only me who thinks this way. :p Oddly enough, I can watch old movies like back to the future and superman with no problem. I can watch the old tomb raider movies with no problem. But if it was a new movie with AJ and actually made after this operation (I know she decided to quit doing Lara ages ago anyway), then it would feel different to me. I don't really know why.

I don't think this would have been a pressing consideration for her.
 
Breasts are a huge part of a woman's identity (no pun intended!), so it must have been one hell of a decision. (or maybe not.. who knows how she came about to deciding).

easy decision tbh... AIAEC

Emma Parlons, a 38-year-old mother from London who had the operation three years ago, welcomed her decision to raise awareness of the issue.

Ms Parlons said her risk of getting breast cancer was the same as the actress's. "If somebody said your flight across the Atlantic was 86% likely to come down, you wouldn't get on that plane would you?" she said in an explanation of her reasons for having the operation.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22520720

Bad situation to be in, rather unpleasant procedure to go through... really don't see the tough decision though. Likely early death vs losing part of your identity...

If I had an 86% chance of a nasty death reduced to 5% if I chop a leg off then I'm chopping the leg off AIAEC.
 
Back
Top Bottom