Girl hits cyclist then jokes about it on Twitter.

Because she's the sort of person to knowingly knock a person off /over in a motor vehicle, drive off with out checking, then brag about. She could have killed the guy and didn't have the decency to admit fault and check the state of the person she hit, then to brag about it.
I hope she gets made an example off, she showed a lack of humanity when she drove off, so why should she have any compassion spared on her

Oh I agree she should be punished wholeheartedly mate. However people sticking their oar in and saying this and that is not helpful.
 
Oh I agree she should be punished wholeheartedly mate. However people sticking their oar in and saying this and that is not helpful.

So your saying we shouldn't have an,opinion on subjects not concerning us?
This forum and pretty much most of society would be dull, also if it wasn't for people butting in the police would never have heard about this
 
So your saying we shouldn't have an,opinion on subjects not concerning us?
This forum and pretty much most of society would be dull, also if it wasn't for people butting in the police would never have heard about this

Well I never said don't have an opinion; just keep it to your ****ing self. Why do people like you feel the need to make yourselves heard? Are your own lives so miserable that you have to point the finger at someone else?

Let him who is without sin...
 
Well I never said don't have an opinion; just keep it to your ****ing self. Why do people like you feel the need to make yourselves heard? Are your own lives so miserable that you have to point the finger at someone else?

Let him who is without sin...

Your in a internet forum, in a subsection called general discussion complaining about people expressing their opinions? You do understand the concept of a forum right?

And then to try to enforce your point of people with opinions needing to keep them to themselves, you then make an unfounded opinion on my life and try to use it as a insult.
Think you should look up the definition of irony.
Also last fine I checked I have never hit and run someone the bragged about it on the internet, so IM to the beach to get a nice supply of rounded stones, they're better in an aerodynamic sense
 
Well I never said don't have an opinion; just keep it to your ****ing self. Why do people like you feel the need to make yourselves heard? Are your own lives so miserable that you have to point the finger at someone else?

Let him who is without sin...

troll?
 
Well I never said don't have an opinion; just keep it to your ****ing self. Why do people like you feel the need to make yourselves heard? Are your own lives so miserable that you have to point the finger at someone else?

Let him who is without sin...

And yet that is your opinion, strange :confused:
 
Well I never said don't have an opinion; just keep it to your ****ing self. Why do people like you feel the need to make yourselves heard? Are your own lives so miserable that you have to point the finger at someone else?

Let him who is without sin...

OH MY WORD.
You are the most opinionated poster on this forum.
 
Well boo hoo.

You hit someone on a bike and you didn't stop to see if everything was ok. FACT.

Then you gloat on the internet of all places that you definitely hit a cyclist and go onto spew what I can only describe as a part-baked, soulless attempt at covering your **** on television. Looking for the sympathy vote much? What an buffoon.

I hope they throw the book at her even more now.
 
She deserves to be punished for the incident itself and driving away, never mind the boasting about it afterwards. Do people ever think before they post on Twitter?
 
Well it sort of is. He can decide to press charges, however the police might have their own agenda anyway.

I thought it was the role of the CPS to decide if someone was going to be formally accused. Obviously they take the wishes of the alleged victim into account, but it's not the alleged victim's decision.
 
[DOD]Asprilla;24328399 said:
I thought it was the role of the CPS to decide if someone was going to be formally accused. Obviously they take the wishes of the alleged victim into account, but it's not the alleged victim's decision.
My understanding is:

The victim can choose to press charges if he or she wishes to (but that doesn't necessarily result in prosecution). However if they decide not to then the CPS might decide to prosecute anyway (if it is in the public interest). At that point they will call upon the victim as a witness for evidence.
 
My understanding is:

The victim can choose to press charges if he or she wishes to (but that doesn't necessarily result in prosecution). However if they decide not to then the CPS might decide to prosecute anyway (if it is in the public interest). At that point they will call upon the victim as a witness for evidence.

Fair enough. I thought the victim didn't get to make the decision in order to stop every Tom, Dick and Harry from wandering into Police Stations and demanding to press charges about totally frivolous stuff.
 
When i got knocked down I was sent a letter offering me four choices on how I "recommended" the driver was punished. It was either

- No Action
- Safety Course
- Points and fine
- Court

I opted for Safety course
 
You cannot "press charges", that's a myth. You can support a prosecution, but its not up to you to decide who gets charged or arrested. Most prosecutions will struggle without the victims support in terms of a statement, but some offences can be dealt with without the support of the victim.

Sometimes, like above, you're input and opinion will be asked for in terms of disposal methods, but the final decision still rests with police/cps.

Domestic violence is a good example, 9 times out of 10, the victim won't assist the police (even after ringing up themselves), but it won't stop the offender being arrested, and possibly charged if other evidence is available.
 
Back
Top Bottom