• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 launches June 25

as speculated earlier - they wont come in less than the 670`s , which have had a price cut.... so expect £240 or more , as £240 > £330 is a big jump , so I personally expect the gtx 760 to be around 259 maybe 269
 
as speculated earlier - they wont come in less than the 670`s , which have had a price cut.... so expect £240 or more , as £240 > £330 is a big jump , so I personally expect the gtx 760 to be around 259 maybe 269

That would be shocking, even if it breaks the £200 mark by anything more than a few quid its to much.

That's assuming its slower than the GTX 670.
 
That 670 looks like a dam good buy gregster well tempted myself now ;) But i must wait until the 760 is released to make sure otherwise i may be kicking myself next week :)

You know it. They have more than 10 in stock, so keep an eye on them :)

Nothing worse than waiting for official specs but if those specs are true for the 760 and that price is correct (300 euros), I would be jumping on those KFA2 670's. KFA2 are a UK company as well, so that should fill anyone buying them with a warm glow :)

That would be shocking, even if it breaks the £200 mark by anything more than a few quid its to much.

That's assuming its slower than the GTX 670.

Agreed and it would only be the 2.0 boost that would make it faster than a 670 and maybe not leave much room for overclocking (speculation of course).
 
Agreed and it would only be the 2.0 boost that would make it faster than a 670 and maybe not leave much room for overclocking (speculation of course).

Do you see the danger here for both Nvidia and AMD users?

I.E using lesser and lesser silicone and instead clocking the nuts off things to make them look good in reviews while leaving sweet FA in the tank.

If the AMD HD 8K slides are anything to go by that's all they are doing.

Mine runs at 975Mhz stock, I can get a 25% overclock out of it, easy. 30% if I hold my nose and pray, it just doesn't look as good as it can be on paper.

On AMD's slides its replacement looks identical, other than a 15% overclock already on it! :mad:
 
Do you see the danger here for both Nvidia and AMD users?

I.E using lesser and lesser silicone and instead clocking the nuts off things to make them look good in reviews while leaving sweet FA in the tank.

If the AMD HD 8K slides are anything to go by that's all they are doing.

Mine runs at 975Mhz stock, I can get a 25% overclock out of it, easy. 30% if I hold my nose and pray, it just doesn't look as good as it can be on paper.

On AMD's slides its replacement looks identical, other than a 15% overclock already on it! :mad:

Of course. It is all about the guys who look at benchmarks and see that the 770 is top dog for the money they are prepared to spend and that is what they will buy and vice versa when the 7970GE was top dog. The likes of us are more clued up (or should be) and know that it is the same card but with a higher overclock. Nvidia released the 680 with a bigger base clock than they wanted in my opinion, just to beat the 7970. AMD respond by releasing the 7970GE (a bigger base clock) to take back the lead. Nvidia respond by releasing the 770 (ignoring Titan and the 780) with better optimizations and higher clocks to take back the lead.

I would hazard a guess that only 20% of PC users at most use forums to see what is what.
 
look at titan once it gets warmed up inside a case then suddenly its not boosting as high as the reviews...

Hardware Canucks highlighted this with the GTX 600.

AMD have the same problem, This boost thing has introduced a mass of systems, they constantly monitor heat and power draw ecte....

I like it in one way, with vSync on it will down clock its self to as low as 300Mhz in menus provided its a solid 60FPS, that's a good thing.

But it will also down clock to 925Mhz if it goes above a set power draw, I have tested this, with +5% Power Line it will go a bit more before down clocking, +10% a bit more still.... ecte, I can get it to 1270Mhz in Heaven Valley @ +20% before it down clocks, not that I have ever completed a bench at that speed, the resulting lightshow sets my heart racing :o 'bottom run GPU with not very good voltage regulators'

Its also down clocked when the GPU reached 97c because MSI AB decided to lock the fan at 20%

So I don't know what to make of it, I also have a Gigabyte 7870, it does not do any of this, it has no boost, but that one BSOD if I push it to hard.
The Tahiti LE with boost has never BSOD.
 
look at titan once it gets warmed up inside a case then suddenly its not boosting as high as the reviews...

You are having a laugh.:D

I never used to get any throttling here

007lld.jpg



And I have absolutely no chance of it here.

bplq.jpg
 
look at titan once it gets warmed up inside a case then suddenly its not boosting as high as the reviews...

Then keep it cool :confused:. I would get throttling if I didn't have a fan profile set, so to stop throttling, I set a 1:1 fan profile and my temps never hit 70c and this is with air cooling.

You do come out with some random things....
 
Why is your mobo and titan's upside down Kaapstad?

I am glad you brought this it up.:D

Before I watercooled the cards I made a point of picking this particular case so that the cards were at the top of the case with good air flow around them to help in avoiding any possibility of them throttling.

Now they are on water it does not really matter where in the case they are.
 
Back
Top Bottom