Female genital mutilation victim was 'aged just seven'

bigjohnsonrichard said:
He obviously has a huge amount of experience of other mens goods being within close proximity to his face.
Click to expand...

It's alright though... they're just ant-eaters...
1692987-J8QCEJC.gif
 
CREATIVE!11 said:
haters be mad cause no girl wants to pull down your pants and see an ant eater and then put it in her mouth.
Click to expand...

She's going to be knocked backwards (literally, yo!) by my massive erect member. Huge and domineering in length a girth with a pristine hood. Much better than a limp **** dried up cut job.

Also; serious issue of the barbarism of female genital mutialtion is now a debate about cut versus uncut penises. Brilliant.
 
Janesy B said:
I've never seen anyone as enthusiastic about penises, is creative failing to tell us something?
Click to expand...

LOL

LordSplodge said:
She's going to be knocked backwards (literally, yo!) by my massive erect member. Huge and domineering in length a girth with a pristine hood. Much better than a limp **** dried up cut job.

Also; serious issue of the barbarism of female genital mutialtion is now a debate about cut versus uncut penises. Brilliant.
Click to expand...

MY NOB IS SO MASSIVE MATE IT REACHES ROUND THE EQUATOR!!

bigjohnsonrichard said:
He obviously has a huge amount of experience of other mens goods being within close proximity to his face.
Click to expand...

Says mr BIG JOHNSON Richard.
 
Last edited:
Meridian said:
I agree. However, there's a significant difference: circumcision makes only a small difference to male pleasure; whereas FGM is designed expressly to prevent female pleasure. Orgasm becomes all but impossible for the vast majority of women who get it. As I said, a whole different scale. It's the difference between being very slightly short-sighted and being blind.
Click to expand...

However FGM is already illegal in the UK so we are already doing something about it. Whereas it is still legal to cut bits off a boy. One s more serious, I wholeheartedly agree, but should that mean we don't try and do something about the other?
 
CREATIVE!11 seems to be trying too hard to insult uncut chaps in this thread... not sure if its jealousy or over compensating for something...
 
RDM said:
However FGM is already illegal in the UK so we are already doing something about it. Whereas it is still legal to cut bits off a boy. One s more serious, I wholeheartedly agree, but should that mean we don't try and do something about the other?
Click to expand...


That wasn't my point. You even managed to quote the bit where I agreed that circumcision was wrong, and still missed the point. What I was pointing out was that while both are genital mutilation, the female version is vastly worse. And what we are doing about FGM in the UK is making it illegal. That's about it. There have been pretty much no investigations into the many ways the law is sidestepped, following up on cases where a child is obviously in danger, or after it is known to have happened. I'm happy to agree that male circumcision should be illegal for any reason except medical. But it's still very minor compared to FGM. And for males to claim some sort of equality of suffering because they've lost their foreskin is to trivialise a very serious operation designed to prevent women form enjoying sex.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom