Royal Baby soon to put in an appearance

[Firestar_3x]

From the Daily Fail:

"He will now take two weeks' paternity leave and accept the full entitlement of £136.78 per week"

Good on William there, hate to see the chap out of pocket in this time of his greatest need.

If true, and I say IF.

Then why shouldn't he? I bet he's served his country more than you ever will, oh and let's not forget him promoting the UK business interests abroad, so I also bet he's produced far more revenue for this country than you ever will....

But keep trying, I'm sure you will find a valid point soon.

 

[Pudney]

And pays taxes on his earnings. Like everyone else who gets paternity pay.

 

[mattyfez]

If I was William, I would name it Jesus 2.0, just to **** every one off.

 

[Biohazard]

Oh, of course that line was broken, why would they even say that >_<

But it is unbroken since 1066.

No it's not.

 

[Scipio_127]

I hope the name they choose is Patrick. A really fine name. And it would probably be a first I think.

 

[n111ck]

(Bit surprised that the Air Force doesn't give full pay for paternity TBH).

Congrats to the Royals!

 

[smelly_legend]

The should call the baby Kong. King Kong.

 

[mattyfez]

(Bit surprised that the Air Force doesn't give full pay for paternity TBH).

Congrats to the Royals!

For the father its only about a weeks full pay?

 

[digipeep]

If true, and I say IF.

Then why shouldn't he? I bet he's served his country more than you ever will, oh and let's not forget him promoting the UK business interests abroad, so I also bet he's produced far more revenue for this country than you ever will....

But keep trying, I'm sure you will find a valid point soon.

Are you for real? Thanks for the laugh though.

 

[Firestar_3x]

Are you for real? Thanks for the laugh though.

As a comeback that scores 1/10.

 

[bam0]

Oh, of course that line was broken, why would they even say that >_<

But it is unbroken since 1066.

Do they not teach history any more? What happened 1649-1660?

 

[digipeep]

As a comeback that scores 1/10.

Thanks for the 1.

 

[Biohazard]

If true, and I say IF.

Then why shouldn't he? I bet he's served his country more than you ever will, oh and let's not forget him promoting the UK business interests abroad, so I also bet he's produced far more revenue for this country than you ever will....

But keep trying, I'm sure you will find a valid point soon.

You support universal benefits then?

 

[Biohazard]

Thanks for the 1.

0.9/10

 

[RDM]

No it's not.

Surely it would depend on how you define broken?

The following link suggests at least some blood links between the current monarchs and William I.

http://www.britroyals.com/royaltree.htm

George I for example was the great grandson of James I/VI so that really isn't a break in the line.

 

[Firestar_3x]

You support universal benefits then?

Undecided, however if he's intitled who's to say he shouldn't?

For all we know the money might be going direct to a charity.

 

[Strife212]

Do they not teach history any more? What happened 1649-1660?

The King's son escaped and returned to restore the monarchy, the line was not broken.

 

[Biohazard]

The King's son escaped and returned to restore the monarchy, the line was not broken.

/facepalm.

I mean, for heavens sake, you are providing the evidence that refutes your own statement.

 

[Biohazard]

Undecided, however if he's intitled who's to say he shouldn't?

For all we know the money might be going direct to a charity.

I think they had children so they can keep the houses & benefits tbh.

He should get into the private sector as well and stop leaching off everyone.

 

[Locky]

New baby on display!