'Lad Mags Bags'

Why just lads mags?

What about all the girls mags with topless hunks on the cover

Surely in the interest of equality all.should be covered
 
Doomedspeed said:
What do people think? Bothered?
Click to expand...

Pointless, ultimately. Are the tame underwear pictures on the covers of such rubbish as "Nuts" and "Zoo" really going to corrupt our delicate youth? Pathetic.

Though some of the proper filth that ends up on motorway service station top shelves probably does need to stay covered up.
 
Last edited:
233 said:
Why just lads mags?

What about all the girls mags with topless hunks on the cover

Surely in the interest of equality all.should be covered
Click to expand...

Didn't you know, men are sex objects. It's all we think about whereas women are all flowery innocent beings without a sexual desire in their bodies and only look at hunky men for artistic purposes.

Same as how when men go to a strip club they are perverts objectifying women and taking 'wimmins rights' back 100 years, whereas women who go and watch the Chippendales are just doing it for a laugh and being independent like their hero Beyonce.
 
Last edited:
With big Dave blocking all the porn on the web, and shops covering mags. Its going to lead to some very frustrated teenagers.
 
Don't see a problem with it, you arnt being stopped from buy the mag and its just one chain thats wanting to do it, some of the covers have been pushing it to be honest.
 
I have no problems with them being covered up. The reasons for them being covered up are ridiculous though. You see worse at the beach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom