VeloViewer Score: 97.33
From 100 of 1,410 segments.
Maximum possible score: 99.68
Whatever that all means?![]()
VeloViewer Score: 97.33
From 100 of 1,410 segments.
Maximum possible score: 99.68
Whatever that all means?![]()
****ging a Viking yet owns a B Twin.....
Tribans are also POS, its just that for the money they are not the worst POS
VeloViewer Score: 97.33
From 100 of 1,410 segments.
Maximum possible score: 99.68
Whatever that all means?![]()
Your VeloViewer score is a way to compare yourself against your peers. It is the average segment position score from your top 25% (max 100) of non-downhill segment.
More detail:
Position score - Each of your completed segments comes with a score, between 0 and 100, that represents your relative position based on the number of other athletes that have also ridden the segment. The higher the score the better!
Why not use placing? - Being 1st of 2 athletes isn't the same value as being 1st of 1,000. Equally being last of 2 athletes isn't anywhere near as bad as last of 1,000. The position score reflects how you stack up against others much better than your actual placing.
25% - Only your top 25% of scores (to a maximum of 100) are taken into consideration as I'm guessing you haven't visited the pain cave for the majority of your segments so we only want to include those where you have.
But we've got local pro's taking the top spots - Seeing as the score isn't based on actual positions then this should well balance out as if the area is good enough for lots of pro's to ride there, chances are there are a lot more non-pro riders too so giving the potential for higher relative scores.
But I'm an awesome downhiller! - I feel your pain but to comply with STRAVA API usage rules, flat or uphill only.
Good ways to improve your score could be:
Go for segments you've not ridden before to get your worse scores out of your top 25%.
Check out your segments where you score below you VeloViewer score but still within the top 25% and try and improve your placing.
Ride segments that have a higher number of athletes as the potential for a higher score is better, but then so is the potential for a lower score.
Get fitter!
Right after I buy 4 x GP4000s tyres I find out theres a new Continental GP4000s II.
Regular 4000s obviously suck now they're completely obsolete and useless *rage throws in bin*
It means you're pretty damn good at cycling.
My score is about 87.
I suppose it would probably be quite a good metric for putting together groups of comparable cyclists.
*cries in the corner with his T5A*
Hard to compare the viking peleton and the Triban 3 as the viking doesn't appear to say which components are used other than they are shimano, but I'd assume lower end than the triban if they aren't mentioned. Tribans also come with lifetime warranty on frame and forks, 2 years on everything else which is nice to have.
A triban may have been better value, but as long as he is happy with it and it gets him cycling.
Cant seem to find anything online about them, any links/info?
Speaking of which, I'm up north for some cycling September 14th/15th. Fancy a cycle around Pendle or me coming along wherever it is you are?Evening rides are getting harder now it's getting darker
We've not seen you for a few Saturdays - you'll have to come out next time you can. Or find a club or something...
My wet weather/winter bike (read my Dad's old bike he built up and doesnt use) has an old 9 speed Campagnolo Mirage/Veloce with a 52/42 and 13-26....was thinking if i could get a compact crank for it, anyone know?
I think about the fact the Eddy Merckx won more races than any of us will ever manage on bikes with worse drivetrains than anything we will be using nowadays. His bikes would have been lighter, sure, but our gears are vastly better.
My wet weather/winter bike (read my Dad's old bike he built up and doesnt use) has an old 9 speed Campagnolo Mirage/Veloce with a 52/42 and 13-26....was thinking if i could get a compact crank for it, anyone know?
It depends how old it is, and what the bottom bracket fittings are like. A guy I ride with has an old steel bike with Campagnolo kit on it. I think he started out with 52/42 and the best he could do was to get a 39t chainring for it, to get it to 52/39, because there wasn't a decent way to get a compact crankset on it. If that's the case, your best bet may be to get the biggest sprocket you can on the cassette, assuming the Italians made anything bigger than a 26 in those days...
Asprilla may be able to point you in the right direction of someone on Bikeradar or a dedicated retro bike site with a man with a beard who will tell you everything you need to know and more besides.