Associate
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2010
- Posts
- 2,317
- Location
- UK
So far, thought nothing special and prefer BF3. Not sure why exactly but feels more arcady.
Battlefield 4 Thread ~ Server details in opening post ~
- Thread starter ~Mike~
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 8,578
- Location
- Lincolnshire
What sort of crash to you get I'm trying to figure out if this is my CPU O/C this week
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 8,578
- Location
- Lincolnshire
Really impressed so far, yes there are a few textures missing and some explosions do nothing in particular happens but its only the beta and I'm getting 70-79FPS average on CF7970GHZ setup.
Has any-one else noticed how smooth the game feels and looks?
Has any-one else noticed how smooth the game feels and looks?
Last edited:
im running it on the rig in my spec and i completely agree with you the game feels and looks smooth, unless GTA 5 has turned my sense of FPS to mush
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 8,578
- Location
- Lincolnshire
This could be the reason 
I was actually playing with you guys for a while - good teamwork
also had a few domination games with DG. Was good times. Have to say I like this game so far. I like the fact that squad commanders can guide you to a point and the VoIP is good when used properly. Compared to the BF3 beta which I also played from day one the servers are very stable.
Associate
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,275
Sooooooo many mixed opinios in every forum. It's like 50% of players absolutely hate it and 50% love it. I haven't played it yet, but I watched tons of streams and it looks very very fun, I think it will be a good successor to BF3
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,230
- Location
- North East England
For fellow Core2Quad owners; how is the performance?
I have yet to try it on my Q9650@4Ghz system, but downloading is really slow
4ghz 9550 and a amd 6950.
Awful. anything from 1-48fps and generally around 33, but feels like its sub 20. Stutters constantly. Also as dg found i think the 'beta' drivers made it worse but its so bad its difficult to tell.
Bring on the final version. Apart from the odd big event type animations there's nothing here that should cause people too many problems (barring it been a complete **** up
)its very hard to control the heli when getting hit by stingers... the physics are greatly improved and helis are insanely fun to fly with a gunner on TS..
I give up, it's unplayable
Tears like a ****, stutters and jerks I feel like i've loaded up the game with 2gb of ram on an old mac!
Oh and before anyone says there's something wrong with my system, in all my time of having this computer i've never seen a game run this bad. Hell BF3 Alpha on the Q6600 ran better!
Wonder if it's the latest beta drivers
What is everyone running graphics wise on their 600's gtxs?
Switched to 320.49 from the beta ones and FPS is much better but still bad. It's now between 40-60 on High and randomly stutters drop it to 20-30 for a second or two before straight back up to 60.
Stinger is crap mate, me and my mate been doing a Recon(me) and him engineer and been taking choppers out in one RPG. I'll just lock on via my spotting kit and he will used the default rpg and it's a one shot every time. If you think they will flare force it, then follow up with second lock on.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,275
A positive comment, finally.
90% of the posts are people saying how bad/good it runs on their PC's and only 10% comment about the actual gameplay
Relax guys, it is just the first day of beta. It will get BETTER. If you think your 3 months old PC sucks take a look at my sig and have a good laugh.
So, is the gameplay better than BF3? I've been watching streams all day and it looks very fun to play.
90% of the posts are people saying how bad/good it runs on their PC's and only 10% comment about the actual gameplay
.
That's because about 10% are playing it with decent frames! While others it's unplayable even on high enders
Ok guys use this thread for PERFORMANCE problems, should hopefully keep this one clean
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18545811
tbh set it at realistic settings with a modern pc and except its a beta its fine
seen some guy whining earlier about pc should run it fine on a q6600 and a 460 gtx that 5 to 6 years old ! this is a brand new game for today !
a decent mid range cpu and decent card like a 670 gtx or 7950 will play it pretty good.
im liking the other game mode better .cant wait for tdm as the reg is moh 2010 like. ill play a bit of conquest but not really my cup of tea.
seen some guy whining earlier about pc should run it fine on a q6600 and a 460 gtx that 5 to 6 years old ! this is a brand new game for today !
a decent mid range cpu and decent card like a 670 gtx or 7950 will play it pretty good.
im liking the other game mode better .cant wait for tdm as the reg is moh 2010 like. ill play a bit of conquest but not really my cup of tea.
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 18,265
- Location
- RG8 9
It is much improved but one does seem to get some good kills with wayward shots, much like MOH.
I am enjoying it to be honest other than the poor optimization a lot of people are suffering.
Loving the hit reg over BF3 all day long and some nice added things like the spawn cam, squad perks, snipers getting carbines and C4 again. I am going around as an attacking recon with a carbine, c4ing vehicles and spotting choppers for engineers.
Fun times.
Loving the hit reg over BF3 all day long and some nice added things like the spawn cam, squad perks, snipers getting carbines and C4 again. I am going around as an attacking recon with a carbine, c4ing vehicles and spotting choppers for engineers.
Fun times.