Most of the time the agenda is about voicing a perceived intellectual superiority over another. What Spoofle is saying is that most people are not scientists, they do not understand the intimate details of the science to which they hold, they take what science tells them on faith...Faith for the most part based on personal evidence. In turn, most religious people also do not understand the intimate details of the religion they follow, they take what the scripture tells them on faith, again for the most part based on personal evidence.
Equating all religion with minority ideologies and interpretations such as Literal Creationism or ascribing a Literal Inherency to every religious person or religion is disingenuous and not an objective position...for all people of reason, then a reasoned, objective position should be a requirement, regardless of whether your philosophical position accepts a Godhead or not...should it not?