It's suggested that if the sighting is the guy carrying Madeline, then Kate missed it by just a few minutes.
Or, to look at it another way, she wouldn't have missed it at all had she not been out cavorting with friends.
It's suggested that if the sighting is the guy carrying Madeline, then Kate missed it by just a few minutes.
Couldn't the DNA have gotten there from transfer, I'm sure they would have still been carrying belongings of hers.
Officers had been told in an email from the Forensic Science Service laboratory in Birmingham that no conclusive traces of Madeleine's DNA had been found in the family's hire car.
But detectives went on to tell Mr McCann, during an eight hour interrogation, that his daughter's DNA had been found in the boot of the vehicle, which was rented more than three weeks after she vanished.
Portuguese police sources suggest DNA tests prove Madeleine's body was in the boot of a car hired by her parents 25 days after she disappeared. Some DNA experts doubt the claims.
The Lancashire police dog report....
Far more conclusive evidence was found in the Renault Scenic, registration no. 59-DA-27 - the car hired by the McCanns. Eddie, the 'cadaver dog', and Keela, the 'blood-hound’, both clearly marked the same car and the same location within the car. The blood found there by Keela (beneath the carpeting in the well of the car) was also degraded. But the FSS lab was able this time, on its first analysis, to find 19 markers, of which 15 markers matched Madeleine's DNA - again, meaning that there were no markers within these 15 that could not have come from Madeleine. With 15 markers out of 19 all matching Madeleine’s DNA, that would give analysts 99.9% confidence that the blood samples were from Madeleine. The DNA of the degraded blood was found not to match with the DNA of the twins, Sean and Amelie, a further indication that the blood was Madeleine’s. These were the initial results that the FSS initially communicated to senior investigating officer Goncalo Amaral and his team.
Woof, Woof..Woof Woof Woof, Woof. Woof, Woof. Woof.
Are you having us barking up a tree, link please?
Ten vehicles were screened in an underground multi storey car park at
Portimao. The vehicles, of which I did not know the owner details, were
parked on an empty floor with 20-30 feet between each. The vehicle
placement video recording and management of the process was conducted
by the PJ. The EVRD was then tasked to search the area. When passing a
vehicle I now know to be hired and in the possession of the McCann family,
the dog's behaviour changed substantially. This then produced an alert
indication at the lower part of the drivers door where the dog was biting and
barking. I recognise this behaviour as the dog indicating scent emitting from
the inside of the vehicle through the seal around the door.
This vehicle was then subjected to a full physical examination by the PJ and
no human remains were found. The CSI dog was then tasked to screen the
vehicle. An alert indication was forthcoming from the rear driver's side of the
boot area. Forensic samples were taken by the PJ and forwarded to a
forensic laboratory in the U.K.
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent'
contaminant or human blood scent. No evidential or intelligence reliability can
be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating
evidence. The remainder of the vehicles were screened by the EVRD without
any interest being shown. Therefore the CSI dog was not further deployed.
Or, to look at it another way, she wouldn't have missed it at all had she not been out cavorting with friends.
You make it sound like they are the worst parents ever for doing so. In hindsight there is probably not a day that goes by that they don't think about getting a babysitter.
I think you will find that leaving children in the room and checking on them periodically has been done by many parents for years. I know my own parents did it when I was young. A case like this though has obviously resulted in people doing otherwise now.
You make it sound like they are the worst parents ever for doing so. In hindsight there is probably not a day that goes by that they don't think about getting a babysitter.
I think you will find that leaving children in the room and checking on them periodically has been done by many parents for years. I know my own parents did it when I was young. A case like this though has obviously resulted in people doing otherwise now.
There's a difference between leaving your kids in a room and checking them periodically... and going out for dinner and leaving them in an apartment on their own :/
So you would be comfortable with leaving your young children asleep on their own whilst you went out for dinner out of site 100 yards away?
In a foreign country?
I find that hard to believe.
yep .
but they did this at least 5 nights in a row , even though the night before she went missing ...that little girl had been heard calling out " Daddy daddy " for over an hour .
There's a difference between leaving your kids in a room and checking them periodically... and going out for dinner and leaving them in an apartment on their own :/
So you would be comfortable with leaving your young children asleep on their own whilst you went out for dinner out of site 100 yards away?
In a foreign country?
I find that hard to believe.
The site above for this one, but Google turns up similar:
This from an archived (deleted) Gerry Mcann blog:
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/traces.jpg
That's what you will find many people do... or at least did.
My parents did that while eating in a hotel restaurant.
I don't have children and as I already pointed out, this case is why you wouldn't consider doing it now.
However, I myself as a child was left in a hotel room, in a foreign country, while my parents and friends dined in the hotel facilities.
While perhaps this might not be something you have experienced, if you ask people of the older generations, I'm sure you will find this was a pretty common practise.