Madeleine McCann's parents

Sliver said:
Blah blah. Statistics can be used to say anything you want. Evidence is what counts and you and your tinfoil club have none really do you ? Ridiculous. My stance as you put it is innocent till proven guilty. Sound familiar ? It should because that is how Western societies evaluate truth claims.
Click to expand...

Me and my what now? :rolleyes:

Your stance is a staunch belief in their innocence without being able to accept the possibility of an alternative (or at least that is how you come accross). I think they could be innocent, but I suspect, based on data for like crimes they may well have had something to do with it. In fact my gut says they did. Clearly I cannot substantiate that, but at least I can accept the possibility of both alternatives.

Personally attacking me for being a conspiracist because I do so, or because I have a different opinion to you is just......well......lol. :rolleyes:

Do I think they killed their daughter, or had an involvment with it? My opinion is they may have, yes. Am I right? I really dont know. Do investigators rely on people asking questions and being suspicious of EVERYONE to properly investigate a case?

Yes of course. But if they had a department filled with people who just assumed everyone was innocent - then no questions would ever be asked would they? So where would that leave our western justice system?
 
I wonder all those people who donated to finding Maddie now regret making those donations??.

Still stand by my previous comment that these 2 have something to do with this especially when she refused to answer those questions...legal advice or not, any sane innocent person would answer them to assure people that she/they are innocent.
 
ColdAsIce said:
Just wow at those questions she refused to answer :o
Click to expand...

I am certainly not a big fan of the McCann's regardless of what happened. But when you read the questions you can understand why legal representation would advise her to say nothing.

The one I would like to know the answer too was 41.

Is it true or not that in England you went so far as thinking about handing over Madeleine to a relative to look after?
Click to expand...

Was this actually based on something or just a standard question given in these kind of investigations?

A lot of the questions seemed to suggest she had problems at some point with her child, that is of course if they are based on truthful information in the first place.

Another thing Scotland Yard should explain and put to rest is the CATS number registered against them. What is it and when did it appear?
 
Scuzi said:
I am very surprised that some Puerto Rican guy has not been investigated.
Click to expand...

I think that's a South Park reference to a episode where a lot of 'murders/suspects' blame some 'Puerto Rican' guy for all the murders or deaths. Basically much like the average build, average height stuff that doesn't really provide an detail.

It was just some 'Puerto Rican' guy **** all help in other words. Can you describe him.... Yeah it was some Puerto Rican guy you know Puerto Rican like.
 
Yas786 said:
I wonder all those people who donated to paying their absurd mortgage payments now regret making those donations??.

Still stand by my previous comment that these 2 have something to do with this especially when she refused to answer those questions...legal advice or not, any sane innocent person would answer them to assure people that she/they are innocent.
Click to expand...

EFA
 
Having looked at those questions it's clear the police were attempting to implicate them, so I imagine their legal team advised them not to answer.
 
Whatever happened, nobody can deny that they are not fit to be parents as normal, loving parents would never leave a child unattended so that they can go and party. At the very least, they should be charged with neglect etc.

I am sure the truth will eventually come to the surface. Too many unanswered questions for it to die a death.

The poor little girl needs to be found one way or another and justice to be served. God bless her.
 
Django x2 said:
That's fine, apart from the police report papers posted fractionally earlier which suggest the dogs singled the car out in a vehicle compound
Click to expand...



Someone posted the actual police report? Or just a paper quoting it? Because unless it's a), you just helped me make my point.
 
RaMDOM said:
Completely disagree. The stress of living like that would be unbearable and someone would confess. I do not believe it to be in the capacity of a parent to do that; they do have other children. If they wanted to move on people would understand; would you want a family member to continue to torture themselves with what seems like a futile quest? No you would encourage them to move on. The public would also think this.

All these people saying they did it; do you have children?
Click to expand...

What if, and nobody has mentioned this as far as I know, one parent knows what happened and the other one doesn't? This would mean that the guilty party would still have to go along with the main parent making all the fuss.

Just thought I'd throw that in for the TFHs.
 
I am glad to see this thread here, when I watched crimewatch and looked online, I came across a picture which, although I can't guarantee the authenticity of the picture it really has terrorised me since I seen it!

2dqsq2s.jpg


what's all of your opinions on the picture above?
 
I saw a quote the other day from mrs McCann saying they had not done anything wrong and infact the person who took Madeleine was the guilty party.

Made my blood boil tbh as a parent. The only people to blame are the pair of them.
 
A quote direct Kate McCann's book:

""I asked Gerry apprehensively if he'd had any really horrible thoughts or visions of Madeleine. He nodded. Haltingly, I told him about the awful pictures that scrolled through my head of her perfect little genitals torn apart"

She isn't normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom