Petition to bring back the Bradbury Pound

I'm not trolling, I asked you some questions earlier in the thread... you've seemingly ignored them... later on you post a 40 minute+ video which you're arrogant enough to assume people will waste their time watching...(just a wild guess but it presents a rather distorted view of fiat currency) if anything you could be said to be trolling - you present an idea ambiguously and the refuse to clarify anything about it.
 
Too...many....idiots.

Banks will maintain their monopoly as the UK is full of morons, as this thread shows.

I won't explain myself....

I'm still holding out for someone to come along, drop a bomb and flatten London, hopefully while all of the good people are on holiday.

Instantly solving a lot of the UK's problems.
 
I'm not trolling, I asked you some questions earlier in the thread... you've seemingly ignored them... later on you post a 40 minute+ video which you're arrogant enough to assume people will waste their time watching...(just a wild guess but it presents a rather distorted view of fiat currency) if anything you could be said to be trolling - you present an idea ambiguously and the refuse to clarify anything about it.

Short answer -

The Bank of England loans money into existence at interest. The UK currently owes its creditors over one trillion pounds (source).

The solution to the problem would be for the Treasury to create interest free money based upon the wealth and potential of the nation (which is substantial).

This would kickstart a productive economy because there is no interest to pay on the money that is created.

Not having to pay interest on the creation of money reduces taxation, allows a free market to flourish and creates national wealth.

It has happened in Iceland and also in Hungary and their economies are now on the mend.

For a longer answer, read the free e-book created on the subject.

There is also an excellent documentary called The Secret of Oz -

 
Last edited:
So I don't have to watch a video, how does increasing the money supply this way not cause inflation. Why is different to just printing money.
 
Short answer -

The Bank of England loans money into existence at interest. The UK currently owes its creditors over one trillion pounds (source).

The solution to the problem would be for the Treasury to create interest free money based upon the wealth and potential of the nation (which is substantial).

What exactly do you mean by this? The bank of England has already been essentially creating money out of think air and purchasing longer dated gilts... we've already got ridiculously low interest rates thanks in part to this - how does your proposal of creating money differ to what has already been done?

This would kickstart a productive economy because there is no interest to pay on the money that is created.

you've not really explained what you mean... though if your aim is to kickstart the economy then I'd point out again that that has already (seemingly) happened
 
wow indeed - you're still seemingly unwilling to engage in any discussion but happy to post videos and copy and paste ambiguous statements
 
I don't know how better to explain it. You currently live in a debt based economic paradigm, you don't need to live in a debt based economic paradigm.
 
You've not even attempted to explain anything... you've just made random statements and asked people to watch videos.... If you're incapable of even engaging in basic discussion about an idea you support, answering questions etc... then why bother starting a thread in the first place.
 
Debt isn't all bad especially if you are talking on a Macro scale. Every pound that borrowed is also loaned my someone, which for them is a form of investment in the economy.

I agree that debt could be wiped out and that unsustainable debt for everyday running costs is not ideal. I also think that forever relying on future growth to boost tax revenues so the country can carry on wasting money is not a real solution.

But creating new money will surely just devalue the money we have especially for those with cash accounts or Gilt edged portfolio which includes a lot of flat rate annuities. Whats the point of wiping out debt if people are worse off as result?
 
I don't know how better to explain it. You currently live in a debt based economic paradigm, you don't need to live in a debt based economic paradigm.

Its pretty much impossible to live in a non-debt based system.

This weeks recommended reading:

"Debt: The first 5000 years"
 
Hungary would respectfully disagree.

Not sure that report is accurate, they paid off their IMF loan, but their banks are still issuing interest bearing debt.

http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/10/06/hungary-no-debt-free-money/

The story originated at the American Free Press. It was linked to at innumerable sites and took Facebook by storm, but unfortunately it is incorrect. Having asked AFP for a reaction, I was told it was an unfortunate editing slip: the story was not passed by the financial editor.
 
Not sure that report is accurate,

shhh don't ruin it for him... the OP seems to be attracted to anything sufficiently 'alternative'... you can't bring questions, facts, or delve too deeply into this sort of thing... instead you're supposed to blindly accept the alternative view/conspiracy which doesn't quite resemble reality and have it reinforced by wacky youtube videos and 'ebooks'.

the "Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels"... I mean a few hundred years ago, sure... these days.. an asset management firm, a small bank, few other small entities... they're hardly in a position to control anything.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom