Britain's "horniest" student wins cash prize for bedding three new men a week

True Freefaller, as do I, but if it had been a male student, and someone had posted the story here, most of the responses would have been somewhat different.
 
In fairness, linking you to rape in an offhand comment isn't anywhere near as bad as the baseless racism and misogyny you extol like a socially oblivious mouthbreather.

Trying to brand me as racist and misogynist is as laughable as it is brain dead. I barely take the likes of you seriously anyway
 
My negative social judgements are based on the fact that she's behaving like an idiot. It would be no different if she were a bloke or if she were just getting ridiculously drunk and not having sex.

Female empowerment and all this populist feminism is a load of claptrap and has gone so far the other way that every randy tart that can't handle a bottle of prosecco is somehow a feminist.

Which is a load of nonsense, because without women like that in the OP, those kinds of males simply wouldn't exist. Frankly, the gender is irrelevant.
But in reality, a majority of the disapproving posts in this thread are related to the fact she's a women & the fact she's sexually confident (not about her acting like an attention seeking idiot, which I'd actually agree on).

If it's nothing to do with views on how women should behave regarding sexual promiscuousness or a huge double standard then it's a perfectly reasonable.

I don't think she's a 'feminist freedom fighter' at all, but some of the posts in this thread do highlight how out of touch some men's views are.
 
Your quoted post - including my signature - suggest otherwise.

Then you cannot tell the difference between tongue in cheek to get a rise and a genuine opinion. Well done for falling for the obvious. You especially as you actually have one of my posts as your signature, lol, silly mare

Here a smile to make you 'get it' ;)
 
Last edited:
True Freefaller, as do I, but if it had been a male student, and someone had posted the story here, most of the responses would have been somewhat different.

Yes undoubtedly, then you have to remember the demographic of the forum ;) Then you realise why it all makes sense.
 
You can Cialis the **** out of a tired penis but ain't no drugs gonna tighten no puss.
I'm sure if you threw a fistful of powered down amphetamines up her Giant Schnauzer it would tighten up like a Boa constrictors handshake.

True Freefaller, as do I, but if it had been a male student, and someone had posted the story here, most of the responses would have been somewhat different.
Male or female a **** is a ****.
 
Having looked at her picture I imagine that 2 out of the 3 guys a week are simply 'taking one for the team'.


















And probably double bagging.
 
You are spot on with the sex life stuff, however, for such an open minded attitude to consider the quoted statement abhorrent suggests little life experience. Abhorrent statements would be "Hitler didn't go far enough, I would have worn the skins." for example.

I actually think you misinterpreted anyway, mainly due to the poor wording ... I read it as insufficiently capable physically and emotionally to deal with long term strings of non-committal sexual encounters with little or no love.

I know plenty of women who portray that they aren't, I'm yet to decide whether I believe them.

Oh get a grip.

There's nothing wrong if you've had no sexual partners, ten sexual partners or ten thousand. It's disgraceful that people (men) judge others (women) poorly because they are seen to enjoy sex with numerous people.

If they are safe, and happy then what's wrong with it? And the suggestion that they wouldn't do it if they were happy is nonsense. Sex is fun. Sex is enjoyable. Sex is good for you!

Again, there's nothing wrong with sleeping with lots of different folk. Nothing wrong what so ever.



Just read this. Could you get any more sexist if you tried? Men are not physically and/or emotionally superior to women in today's world. Why can't a women enjoy herself? Who are you, a man, to say that that person can't do what THEY WANT TO DO because they are female. You're attitude is abhorrent. And I'm very surprised, and disappointed by you.
 
The signal to noise ratio of this forum has just been improved considerably. Thank you.

I'm sure if you threw a fistful of powered down amphetamines up her Giant Schnauzer it would tighten up like a Boa constrictors handshake.


Male or female a **** is a ****.
 
Bit late on this, and can't be bothered to read through all the posts, but I assume everyone has realised by now that this is just a pr stunt by a website which has been lapped up by the gutter press who will print any old **** that is spoon fed to them nowadays? The whole account is most probably fiction
 
Damn I miss Uni :(.



Also, this.
Would smash with the force of 1000 Greek gods, just because I bet she's absolute filth

Tbh, if I was able to sleep with 3 different women a week, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Would I do it for £500 and a bit of infamy? No thanks Jeff
 
In fairness, linking you to rape in an offhand comment isn't anywhere near as bad as the baseless racism and misogyny you extol like a socially oblivious mouthbreather.

Q: Why is it OK to make assumptions about Rob's charactor from another thread and then use that against them in this unrelated thread?
Those are not facts you've presented they are just a negative personal opinion, this surely makes your comment a personal attack?

I've seen the same sort of comment a few times now and it always gets ignored by mods, so maybe I've misunderstood what constitutes a personal attack in here? :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom