The wacky world of censorship
- Thread starter Mr Badger
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
Who is "your"? I haven't done anything insane lately. Is this the part where you make sweeping stereotypes and generalisation like you were called out earlier on about?
Unless you count the muslims torturing each other in Syria (not seen pictures like that since WWII), and the mega rich oil ME/GCC countries refusing to accept any Syrian refugees because... oh that's right, they haven't got an excuse have they?
Wow, doesn't that make the Middle East look really bad? muslims not offering other muslims hospitality, awkwardand muslims killing muslims. Funny how that's only an issue when westerners do it.
Is this were you change topic, like I mentioned before...
Guess you didn't watch Ross kemp in the congo? Perhaps if you removed your blinkers that only allow you to focus on Muslims you may suprise yourself. Some truly atrocious things happening there.
Perhaps the country's that have been perpetuating the war should also accept some refugees, like the UK whom have finally as of today, allowed a small number of refugees in. If I'm not mistaken turkey, and neighbouring countrys are pretty much at capacity.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,564
- Location
- Warwickshire
Why does asim18 think you cannot be opposed both to porn censorship and pig censorship? Did anyone manage to establish that?
I don't think that. I'm personally against both.
I'm merely trying to point out that porn censorship is a more pressing issue with more immediate ramifications, yet some people are so preoccupied with bashing Islam and find a way to amplify this nonsense pig censorship like it's something major just because a bunch of Muslims are behind it.
To further elaborate:
As much as one may hate Islam, a blanked out pig in an Islamic library, Muslim school, etc. isn't going to affect you in any way.
As much as one may love David, a mass censorship of legal porn outlets is going to affect many people in mostly negative ways.
Last edited:
I don't think anyone's tried to claim this is anything major though, it might be more helpful if you addressed your concerns at specific posts rather than arguing against some general perception which may well be misplaced. The muslim pig censorship is more amusing than anything, its utterly absurd.
The Muslim Lib Dem candidate who's recently posted a link on twitter to a mohammed cartoon and said he wasn't offended by it is perhaps more serious as he's since received death threats. Still the idea that people are getting wound up by it is also rather silly.
The fact that more serious issues exist doesn't mean we shouldn't have threads about less serious issues... perhaps no one should ever talk about benefits claimants and poor people in the UK as there are much more serious poverty issues occurring in Africa?
You keep replying here, that sounds iffy to me.
I'm referring to the 0.01% of nutters we have here and the Billion or so across Africa and ME.
Same topic, you were still asking for examples of how awful muslims are, I was just working my way through a big list of examples. Anyway as you are now changing the topic yourself..
Don't watch TV, but I hear a lot about muslims killing Christians in Africa, and in fact muslims doing just that in Congo (Seleka and Janjaweed miltia, fresh from butchering women and children in Dafar).
Are you sure Islam is OK with that? Funny kind of religion IMO
How has the UK perpetuated the war?
The only reason Cameron has been holding back about letting in more muslims is because of the backlash of opinion, muslims have such a godawful reputation for poo-stirring that it's political suicide to let even more in.
You think if Poland had an civil war that anyone in the UK would blink twice about letting in a few more Poles? No Burka/riot/poppy/bombing/cartoon/pig nonsense from them.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
And so you do you, sound a bit iffy to me.
So you accept you're making stereotypes and generalizations and are calling all Muslims nutters. Thank you
Oh really, please point to where I asked you for examples? Is this the part where you create an argumentum no one else brought up, so you can take it off topic. I'll guess now you will ignore this and move the discussion elsewhere like you normally do
I'm actually following your topic rather than changing it, surely you can see this.
It may be enlightening to you Congo is 96% Christian, and 99% percent of the killings are being perpetrated by Christians on fellow Christians. But thanks for proving my point again regarding you and your blinkers
Even in such a conflict you still manage to find something about Muslims with your tunnel vision....Did you miss Hague's numerous speeches? Have you missed the supply of equipment / funding / training and possibly weapons via back channels? You know the bit where wanting to change regimes for political reasons.
"People" Bitslice, vulnerable people, anyhow my point was about your claims of neighbouring countries not letting refugees in which you have ignored with some facts regarding neighbouring countries being at capacity. And my point about those perpetuating the war, aka the UK and western nations (as proven above) baring some responsibility for there actions resulting in more pain for the vulnerable.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 7,058
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
It is a majority muslim country (approximately 60%)
Don't see why they'd bother censoring pictures of pigs though - doesn't make much sense considering that pretty much every supermarket has a pork section (although, staffed by non muslims)
Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,564
- Location
- Warwickshire
There's a separate thread for that
. It sounds like you're so desperate to stop people discussing Muslims that you're trying your best to deflect attention elsewhere. It's almost like you're trying to...censor the discussion!
It is a majority muslim country (approximately 60%)
Don't see why they'd bother censoring pictures of pigs though - doesn't make much sense considering that pretty much every supermarket has a pork section (although, staffed by non muslims)
Yes but, as you know, some of the decisions taken in Malaysia are bat**** crazy
100 years? Blacks were second grade citizens in the US just 50 years ago or in South Africa 20 years ago. Racism is still rampant today, as seen on many football stadiums around the world (even in the UK).
Certain cultures within the islamic culture are barbaric and misogynist but that happens all over the world, regardless of religion, in places such as certain parts of the bible belt in the US, India, rural China etc.
Again, what you refer to here is a minority within Islam.
Violence is not an inherent part of Islam, it's an inherent part of underdeveloped cultures. Here's how a so called "peaceful" religion manifests itself in such cultures:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23653213
Not angry over muslims, they do endlessly provide irritation or laughter though, always happy to point this out.
I do get angry over stupid fawning pussy liberal fascists though, they really pee me off
You definitively have something against Muslims because you've shaped your opinions based on superficial inspection of information. You see a lot sensantionalist titles regarding Muslims in the media so your conclusion is that they must be psychopathic, retarded, etc because you ignore all other sources of information. You should consider the media tends to cover a lot of murders, rapes etc. and if someone who didn't understand your culture shaped their opinion in the same way you do, they would wrongly conclude the Western World is a horrible place crawling with murders and rapists.
You should be angry at your ignorance instead of those stupid fawning pussy liberal fascists.
Nope, as pointed out before what muslims in the UK do has zero effect on me, and I'm well aware that I'm talking about a minority (although a lot of issues regarding the actual religion still apply to a majority, and some iffy opinions do actually apply to a significant number).
I'm not presenting an opinion, I'm just commenting on news stories.
Scientologists are fundamentally retarded too, they just don't appear in the news every week pointing this out to everyone, hence no comment is possible. On that basis I don't "have something against" them either.
Believe me I really do want to comment on scientologists and their charitable status.
Your comments that other people do the same things, maybe they do, but only one group is associated worldwide with violence and that's always going to be Islam. It's a disruptive and aggressive religion, no matter where they pop up, social disruption occurs. Try and name one country where this isn't so, I can't.
You can't keep promoting such nonsense, violence follows Islam like flies to poo.
All of South America is poor, hardly anything worth reporting on.
All of India is poor, they are too busy raping women to fight over anything.
Syria isn't underdeveloped, it's apparently a lovely place (was). Give a Muslim a gun, instant war.
In fact most of the ME is nice, it's only at war all the time because it's full of muslims.
It's like putting an Irishman into an empty pub, instant bar fight, one person hospitalised.
The culture of Islam actively promotes intolerance, social disruption and separatism, it is that which perpetuates violence.
Last edited:
I don't have figures for the billion, but I'm fundamentally distrustful of any religion where the followers ignore big chucks of their own dogma, but consistently pretend otherwise. For the sake of argument let's assume they are all nutters to one degree or the other.
What Congo is or isn't is irrelevant when borders are fluid and many milita come from other countries. Oh look, a 10% Muslim population, is there a war on? Why yes there is, however did you guess...
Sauce?
Afaik supply was of defensive gear and medical aid. It would be stupid supplying the muslim brotherhood with weapons. Personally I think we are supporting the wrong side and for no apparent logical reason, aiding radical groups instead?
I didn't say I was opposed to the move. Plenty of houses in Wales and Scotland going empty, Clegg has many spare rooms.
In fact I think immigration should be entirely on a visa basis, lots of people could come and then go home when the war ended.
My point was about Saudi and quatr, which has repeatedly avoided taking responsibility for anything in the ME, despite secretly being behind half of it.
Last edited: