If only I could show my feelings at these decisions by not paying my TV licence.
be better at their jobs?
why would the agency pass up a good act unless it doesn't sell because its not good.
remember relevant content is part of the parameters for a good act.
Must admit there are very, very few female comedians who I consider funny.
The thing I dislike about the massive majority of female comedians is that they bang on about being female or being fat... Likewise, a lot of foreign comedians bang on about being foreign...
Don't find it funny![]()
Mock the week will be ruined by this, unless they manage to find a female version of Frankie boyle
Orchestras in the US used to have a 90:10 gender bias in favour of men. The people running auditions believed that they were picking orchestra members based on merit. They believed that men were naturally better at playing in an orchestra. Why would they pass up on a good musician?
Then these orchestras started using blind auditions. And guess what? The percentage of successful women applicants rose to around 35%. It became clear that the people running the auditions were discriminating against women.
If you still think that comedians are being chosen on merit, let me give you another example:
Orchestras in the US used to have a 90:10 gender bias in favour of men. The people running auditions believed that they were picking orchestra members based on merit. They believed that men were naturally better at playing in an orchestra. Why would they pass up on a good musician?
Then these orchestras started using blind auditions. And guess what? The percentage of successful women applicants rose to around 35%. It became clear that the people running the auditions were discriminating against women.
Source.
Unfortunately, it's impossible to audition comedians without knowing their gender.
Those figures still show a very strong bias towards men, So either the men were naturally better at playing in an orchestra, or the blind auditions didn't really solve anything.
It's going to end up them repeating the same female comedians week after week and it'll get dull, or they'll get some rubbish unfunny female comedians in.
To add to this, you'd also need to look at the ratio of men to women applying... Was the increase in selected women the result of more women applying?
To add to this, you'd also need to look at the ratio of men to women applying... Was the increase in selected women the result of more women applying?
Read the link I posted. 30% of the gain was attributed to blind auditions.
I reckon there will be a rise in entertaining female personalities that go on panel shows rather then recycling the same female comedians, i.e. people like Jamelia.
Maybe we will see some more non-self depreciating female comedians out of this, but I reckon they will ruin some great shows.
But "entertainers" who are actually entertaining outside of their regular duties are pretty few and far between and while they work on something like never mind the buzzcocks, on a show like 8 out of 10 cats it only works if the panels are comedians.
I don't think you quite get my point... 30% gain might have been the result of more women applying therefore you will automatically get an increase in the number of females being selected. You need to take into account the ratio of male/female before blind auditions and during blind auditions to see if such increase is a direct result of the blind audition or more females applying between the date range specified.