Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2010
- Posts
- 4,184
I certainly wouldn't.
The game would look better and generally 60fps is not required for this type of game. It's hardly a fast paced game after all.
New Konami MGS V game comparisons.
- Thread starter kitch9
- Start date
I certainly wouldn't.
The game would look better and generally 60fps is not required for this type of game. It's hardly a fast paced game after all.
I guess when/if they release some direct comparison screenshots between those two versions, the difference will become more clear, but they both look pretty good from where I'm sitting. A lot of people are still using 720p displays though and 60fps will certainly make a bigger difference to how the game feels, so that's presumably what they were aiming for here.
"It's not dog crap, you just don't like the taste!"
Last edited:
Yeah, no. As I said, you disliked what was said, which is fair enough it's your choice but it doesn't mean it's actually trolling. It was factual.
Well that's not really how it works. Resolution doesn't denote visual quality.
Crysis 3 at max settings at 720p will look better than Half-life 2 maxed out at 720p and would require a lot more powerful hardware to run.
It depends on how you're looking at it, if you're solely interested in having the most powerful console regardless of games available, then it's not an unreasonable statement of claim.
They clearly don't want the press discussing the large differences instead of just discussing the game at launch.
Kojima said that the versions would be the same at E3 also when he was getting paid by MS to be at their conference.
Depends if your eyes are painted on or not I suppose.
They know that this this will get dissected in depth by DF when the game comes out so they decided to do some of the work for them.
I applaud them for doing this, if only every other dev did it from the off. Then DF would have to do more than click-bait articles and be like they used to be.
I just wish they wouldn't do these face off comparisons and would just present each version in it's own articles, then let the console warriors construct their own arguments instead of giving them the bullets to fire.
Last edited:
So the press are not going to discuss it because Konami were transparent about it on their site?
Of course it'll be discussed regardless of anything Konami says or does.
Whatever, spoffle. It was merely a polite request to keep the bigger Xbox vs PS debate out of a thread about a specific game.
But they're not comparing The Xbox One version to the PS4 directly; none of the comparisons on the website pitch them against each other. They're all last gen vs new gen, intended to show off what technical improvements they're able to achieve with more powerful hardware.
So a polite request is accusing someone of trolling? Yeah sure, okay...
My initial post was. If it quacks, it's a duck.
Actually I found that link refreshing for a dev - least its upfront and obvious rather than the usual hidden behind flowery and imprecise sentences. Hopefully other developers will do the same, but they wont - they have sales to worry about which I doubt MGSV has.
Just glad Kojima being on the XO stage didnt mean in the end parity which would have sucked. Still not getting the game til we get a better idea when Phantom Pain is out, I know its got more replay value outside of the 2hour run, but Id rather play both back to back...
P.S. Im sorry but that limited edition PS4 was written in, I find it poor compared to the PS3 ones Japan got...
ps3ud0
Just glad Kojima being on the XO stage didnt mean in the end parity which would have sucked. Still not getting the game til we get a better idea when Phantom Pain is out, I know its got more replay value outside of the 2hour run, but Id rather play both back to back...
P.S. Im sorry but that limited edition PS4 was written in, I find it poor compared to the PS3 ones Japan got...
ps3ud0
Who's going to call the forum police?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
