Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Tell that to a hardcore Skyrim gamer(15,000+ playing right now)/modder that's running highly modded who knows what their doing, resulting in probably one of if not the best looking games to date-I already quoted one above.
Shudder the thought it's the 7th most played title on Steam today:
http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
If you use fallacies then holes shall be picked. Not that I did there but OK
I'll even wack 8X MSAA on and down sample and make you a cuppa whilst you check all my texture mods 
It was a predictable attempt at pouring doubt over facts that cannot be dismissed:
Skyrim is the most obvious, a few titles can bust 2GB@1600p while still being playable on tri or quad setups, I simply didn't state said titles as icba with circular arguments, but look at it now.
You couldn't(be bothered???) have read what I wrote-clearly 2GB limitations@1600p, if you did you wouldn't be disagreeing but agreeing at the same time.
Skyrim isn't a problem at all at 2560x1440p with 3GB (even with three cards). Come over and play it on mine Rusty
Oh so you're stating that 2GB may become limiting on a tri/quad set up. Thanks Captain Obvious for your valuable input
No I just skim read your posts because most of the time they either just contain whinging and/or bickering so missed the specific point regarding tri/quad SLI - apologies. I don't disagree in this scenario.
I've finished it all and all the DLC a while back. I modded it to the **** at 1440 and never went above 2.5GB. I could have added more but then the chances of conflict would increase and the game looked nice enough. I don't see the point of adding more AA just for the sake of it.
When vram isn't an issue@1600p, your 4 2GB gpus are going to be faster than 2 4GB cards, that's the point I was making, there are a few titles that can stop your 4 gpus in their tracks though, where they are vram limited with plenty gpu grunt left in the tank.
The easiest scenario to mention(as specific game titles just cause arguments) is Skyrim.
2GB/4GB 680 vram limitations on modded Skyrim
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.ph...-geforce-gtx-680-4-gb-jetstream.html?start=16
^
There is another example of many.
Afaik, there is conflicting reports that Skyrim can only use 3.1GB vram, then it crashes(it's a known bug but Bethseda won't fix it as they don't support modding, simply allow it) but others stating they can get it to 5GB vram usage too with Titans/6GB 7970's, whether or not the community fixed the bug idk as my time has passed with Skyrim.
I am not implying in the slightest your 690's are of no use, just stating that it can be breached under certain circumstances.
Before the 'ridiculous' type comments flood in, just as it's Kaps choice to purchase a bat cave full of gpu's, it's an individuals choice whether they mod the **** out of a title too.
