They just wanna keep the 'upper class' areas 'upper class', by forcing the lower orders and their tatty bangers off from the roads. Central London is full of obnoxious stuck up twits anyway.
Obviously the exact same requirements will be applied to all public transport vehicles, goods vehicles and taxis. Or not.
They just wanna keep the 'upper class' areas 'upper class', by forcing the lower orders and their tatty bangers off from the roads. Central London is full of obnoxious stuck up twits anyway.
Good plan. Lets scrap a load of perfectly serviceable older cars, and instead pump a load of **** into the atmosphere by building new ones with marginally lower emissions.*
*Some or all of this post may be sarcastic.
Nah, I'm a believer that this kind of thing (and the "moron" road tax system) is just there to prop up a flagging new car industry and put money in the coffers.
Think about it - for every £10,000 car sold the government get a cool two grand.
Get the majority of the brainless population believing it and the money will start rolling in quickly.
No doubt the transportation the MPs use will be somehow exempt from these regulations. If it wasn't it wouldn't get passed.
Nothing to do with energy security
Pollution/health
EU carbon limits we've agreed to and will be fined massive amounts if we don't comply.
EU carbon limits we've agreed to and will be fined massive amounts if we don't comply.
Some or all of that post is bang on!
Lets boost the economy by forcing people to upgrade their cars.
Looks like a poor tax to me.
And the sooner we ******* get out of the EU the better!!![]()
That was my feeling!!
I enjoy taking my family to London for day trips, but I wouldn't be in a financial position to replace my car to be compliant!
What a short sighted silly view. Its far from perfect, but its still good and implement a lot of things we would be worse off without.
Why on earth would you drive into the centre. Why would you pay the congestion charge, drive to the outskirts and get public transport in, that way you avoid any sub schemes.
What a short sighted silly view. Its far from perfect, but its still good and implement a lot of things we would be worse off without.
Microsoft
u wot m8
Sounds good to me, better air quality.
And forces a better fuel efficient motoring fleet.
Horaay for a massive influx of migrant workers/criminals (delete as appropriate). Taking the jobs we don't have.
Have you seen the state of the UK economy?
Out of EU full stop.
It's the buses that cause poor air quality.
The response to my OT question. Just wondered, that's all. Back on topic.
The big diluter to the CO2 and air quality argument is that we tax cars on emissions, fine high polluters etc. but then we don't do it based on actual miles driven.
We also let the likes of China and USA pump tons of CO2 from coal into the atmosphere and (seem) to put little pressure on them to change.
If global warming, pollution, and air quality is a problem I'm happy to address it, as long as "we're all in it together" (tm D.Cameron).
Go back to your daily mail properganda, or better still go look out the window.