Finally up-to-date following a MasterChef marathon and I think there's a fairly robust mix of personalities and abilities on show thus far.
I'm hoping we get a couple more decent candidates out of next week - would be good to see a couple of female contestants make the grade so we get an even mix in the semis.
How did it play out last year after the preliminary rounds had been seen off? I dropped out at this stage and only came back in for the final three.
Robert - clearly someone with fine dining experience, albeit from an eating point of view and not necessarily from a cooking one. Seems to have lots of big ideas and wants to show off a range of skills, but is incredibly messy in the kitchen and makes silly little errors that bely his outwardly confident appearance. If he can take a step back and accept he doesn't yet know everything, he could be a contender.
Dani - needlessly fussy presentation aside, a fairly decent cook but one with limited ability. I'm not sure he's got the skills and the wide-ranging knowledge of cuisine to win, but if he's able to keep within his comfort zone he could make the final rounds. I just don't think he's got what it takes and his lack of cooking knowledge could well trip him up in the next stage.
David - my pick for the title. Seems very capable and has a fairly robust skill-set and knowledge of cuisine that could and should see him through to the final three at the very least. I only see his plating-up as a real weakness, but that's easy enough to brush up on and his use of flavours and techniques afford him a good foundation on which to improve. He's also relatively humble about his abilities, which is always a winner with me.
Angela - not sure she's got the temperament to make the final rounds, but she's certainly got the necessary skills. At times her cooking looks almost effortless and that's the mark of a great cook. If she starts taking it seriously she could make a real go of it and it's a refreshing change to see an older female contestant with the qualities that she has.
Micheal - I feel he's trying too hard to impress and he lacks wide-ranging skills, although he's clearly a competent cook. If he can reign himself in a little and stick to concentrating on flavours and presentation over technique and gimmicks, he could make the final three. He's certainly got the capability to learn and improve, which is an important factor in winning MasterChef.
Ping - until she's taken well outside her comfort zone we won't know just how good she is, but there's a degree of capability there and she's certainly impressed John. Technically she seems sound and she's not shy with her flavours, but can those skills translate to other cuisines?
Jack - he's good, but I don't know if he's good enough. He seems to be a very capable 'one dish' cook - to me, it looks like he's learned to cook a plate of food through repetition but he doesn't actually appear to understand the techniques that underpin them. I'd like to see more of his cooking where he's not been able to plan the dish well in advance.
Luke - I remain unconvinced by him. While he seems skilled and technically adept, watching the snippets of him revealed (to me, at least) that he's got a long way to go. I just think he lacks the basic foundations upon which a great MasterChef champion is borne and may well get found out during the next round.
Theo - bit of a cheeky chappy, which is already grating on me, but he's a competent cook and has shown relative skill with a wide range of cuisines. My main concern with him is that he's shown himself to be okay-ish at everything and hasn't really nailed a dish yet. I don't think he going to be good enough when it matters.
Dani - needlessly fussy presentation aside, a fairly decent cook but one with limited ability. I'm not sure he's got the skills and the wide-ranging knowledge of cuisine to win, but if he's able to keep within his comfort zone he could make the final rounds. I just don't think he's got what it takes and his lack of cooking knowledge could well trip him up in the next stage.
David - my pick for the title. Seems very capable and has a fairly robust skill-set and knowledge of cuisine that could and should see him through to the final three at the very least. I only see his plating-up as a real weakness, but that's easy enough to brush up on and his use of flavours and techniques afford him a good foundation on which to improve. He's also relatively humble about his abilities, which is always a winner with me.
Angela - not sure she's got the temperament to make the final rounds, but she's certainly got the necessary skills. At times her cooking looks almost effortless and that's the mark of a great cook. If she starts taking it seriously she could make a real go of it and it's a refreshing change to see an older female contestant with the qualities that she has.
Micheal - I feel he's trying too hard to impress and he lacks wide-ranging skills, although he's clearly a competent cook. If he can reign himself in a little and stick to concentrating on flavours and presentation over technique and gimmicks, he could make the final three. He's certainly got the capability to learn and improve, which is an important factor in winning MasterChef.
Ping - until she's taken well outside her comfort zone we won't know just how good she is, but there's a degree of capability there and she's certainly impressed John. Technically she seems sound and she's not shy with her flavours, but can those skills translate to other cuisines?
Jack - he's good, but I don't know if he's good enough. He seems to be a very capable 'one dish' cook - to me, it looks like he's learned to cook a plate of food through repetition but he doesn't actually appear to understand the techniques that underpin them. I'd like to see more of his cooking where he's not been able to plan the dish well in advance.
Luke - I remain unconvinced by him. While he seems skilled and technically adept, watching the snippets of him revealed (to me, at least) that he's got a long way to go. I just think he lacks the basic foundations upon which a great MasterChef champion is borne and may well get found out during the next round.
Theo - bit of a cheeky chappy, which is already grating on me, but he's a competent cook and has shown relative skill with a wide range of cuisines. My main concern with him is that he's shown himself to be okay-ish at everything and hasn't really nailed a dish yet. I don't think he going to be good enough when it matters.
How did it play out last year after the preliminary rounds had been seen off? I dropped out at this stage and only came back in for the final three.