Motorola Moto E tipped for May release to replace Moto G(worse than Moto G!!)

They can make a short term loss as they have bigger companies backing them.

The same reason people spend £500 on plastic Samsung's.

And Moto are going for the £350-400 market with the Moto X so undercutting the uber flagships.
 
I would say the Motorola Defy was the handset which started it all - unlike a lot of Motorola phones it had worldwide availability,and for a weatherproof phone was relatively cheap. My old one survived several dunks in the sea and it was built like a tank.

The main issue with Motorola Android phones was their half arsed attitude to keeping the OS up to date,which was also seen with the Defy. This really put off many people - their hardware tended to be perfectly fine.

I hope Lenovo learn this lesson - after all they did use the IBM consumer PC business to good effect,so despite my reservations about the Moto E and Moto G situation,I am optimistic they will do a decent job longterm.

Motorola,after all has a rich history when it comes to mobile phones.
 
Last edited:
Making attractive products that people want to buy with next to no or zero profit is easy; you just shove all the best hardware into a device and sell it for the cost of the parts. However, that does not make you a successful company; in fact, I'd argue that makes you a very unsuccessful company as you are failing in your primary objective; to make as much profit as possible.

I'm not sure if what Motorola is doing will actually secure their future in the long term. All that's happening is that they're cheapening their brand; people will come to expect Motorola phones to cost around £100/whatever, and won't be prepared to spring for the more expensive devices that actually make them a healthly profit. Sadly, it's probably too late for Motorola as Apple have long since secured their position as the de-facto gold standard in smartphones (why spend £500 on a Motorola when you can get an iPhone type mentality etc).

I completely disagree with this. Being a high volume low margin company is potentially hugely profitable, Nokia made most of it's money doing exactly this before the smartphone craze hit and they got left behind. You don't cheapen your brand by making low price high quality products, you cheapen your brand by making low price low quality products.

Brand image is directly related to quality not price.

Personally I think being the defacto cheap high quality smartphone is an incredibly strong position to be in, and thats what drew Lenovo very quickly to Motorola when they saw the volume of Q1 2014 sales.
 
I completely disagree with this. Being a high volume low margin company is potentially hugely profitable, Nokia made most of it's money doing exactly this before the smartphone craze hit and they got left behind. You don't cheapen your brand by making low price high quality products, you cheapen your brand by making low price low quality products.

Brand image is directly related to quality not price.

Personally I think being the defacto cheap high quality smartphone is an incredibly strong position to be in, and thats what drew Lenovo very quickly to Motorola when they saw the volume of Q1 2014 sales.

I guess time will tell but personally I don't think it's a sustainable model going forward.
 
Motorola,after all has a rich history when it comes to mobile phones.

This...I don't completely know why but I they are my fav phone manufacturer. a lot of the time during their phone business, their stuff oozes quality.

They had/have some proper pedigree in the mobile sector. I would love my next phone to be the new Moto X.
 
This...I don't completely know why but I they are my fav phone manufacturer. a lot of the time during their phone business, their stuff oozes quality.

They had/have some proper pedigree in the mobile sector. I would love my next phone to be the new Moto X.

The Moto X is pretty nice,and I do like how they thought out of the box,with using different chips to speed up the functionality of the phone. Even the Droid Razr Maxx was more out of the box thinking,where they still actually made a thinnish phone with decent battery life.

Personally,I think it was Motorola not concentrating on regular software updates for their phones and being too US orientated ,which did not help them in the past IMHO of course.

They have frequently produced quite decent phone hardware going back decades. Phones like the StarTAC,etc.
 
Last edited:
Plus I really like the way they designed the X's aesthetics too. Proper molded ergo back and super small bezels allround.

And I'm so glad their activ notifications require OLED - My fav display tech.
 
Some cryptic comments about LTE support in the 3G version of the Moto G:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8012/motorola-introduces-the-moto-g-with-lte

It appears the dual SIM version did not have it but the normal one did,but the software support was not there(how convenient) so it was deactivated. Plus we already know the microSD card slot was already there due to the teardown.

It also seems the LTE version will have 8GB of onboard storage and not 16GB.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom