• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia patents a turbofan to cool the upcoming GPU

I shall wait and see if the 390 launches at ~£330 like the 290 did.

I'm not saying it would be bad, just that it's nice to have the choice of a cheap cooler or a good cooler (the custom cooled cards).

The other thing that might be interesting is how the board partners respond. With the exception of Asus, MSI and Gigabyte (think that's it) none of them have had to produce a cooler to compete with a decent reference cooler for a while.
That's not to say the custom coolers we currently have aren't good, but I think 2 of the best (Sapphire Tri-X/Vapor-X and the PCS+) are both larger than 2 slots solutions (I believe). If the reference cooler is decent and 2-slot that's a slightly different scenario I'd imagine.

The PCS+ is a 2.5 Slot cooler, but because of the XDMA xFire you can put them a few inches apart on a good Motherboard.
My Asus Sabertooth has 4 16x PICe and its quite long, with one in Slot 1 and the other in slot 4 there is a good 4 inches space between them.
 
They're on record as saying they won't copy the titan cooler because they want to keep the cost down, so i wouldn't expect a price hike. Its not unreasonable to expect a better cooler for the money we pay though and hopefully they deliver one.

They are also on record as saying the will defiantly be no HD7990 as the simply isn't a market for it :P

Just saying, nothing is ever set in stone where money is involved.
 
It just needs to be more substantial with a more efficient blower fan.

AMD are running about $150m a year profit, It wouldn't hurt to give $5m to someone like HIS to design a really good Reference cooler for them.

It boggles the mind that amd seem unable to make a good cooler that is both quiet and dumps heat outside the case. There was a rumour going around a while ago that one of the cards (can't recall if it was 79 series or r29 series) supposedly had amd contacting multiple companies to design a stock heatsink for it and the best design would be on the card. Apparently turned out to be BS but all the same if amd are unable to do a good job of it, seems to be a move that they should give some thought to.

The difference between stock amd designs and stock NVidia designs is there for all to see, compare the cooler which started out on the 690gtx and had variations for the titan and 780 compared to what amd had for the 7900 series and forward to where we are today. The NVidia designs just seem to have much more thought applied to them, whereas amd seem content to use an annoying cooler design that should have been taken out the back and given a good kicking years ago.

"Cool", quiet and dump the heat out the back, that's whats needed and its about time amd took note of this instead of recycling a cooler that's long outstayed its welcome. They said the 6990 was cool and quiet, it wasn't. They said the 7990 was cool and quiet, it wasn't. Time to get the thumb out.
 
A GPU company comes up with a type of fan that cools better and is quieter than the norm? Excellent idea, good on them. Here's hoping it leads to quieter, more powerful and better cooled GPUs in future (from both camps would be nice if AMD can come up with a similar solution).

Yeah, better reference cooling would be awesome. Especially for AMD, its something that they have lagged behind in for the last couple of years.
 
Why does every single news thread have to be a slanging match? Debates are good but reading this sub forum lately is shockingly embarrassing!!

Give it a rest fellas, it is a fan on a GPU for Christ sake.
 
Why does every single news thread have to be a slanging match? Debates are good but reading this sub forum lately is shockingly embarrassing!!

Give it a rest fellas, it is a fan on a GPU for Christ sake.

The slanging match was deleted, now we're debating stock coolers. :)
 
It boggles the mind that amd seem unable to make a good cooler that is both quiet and dumps heat outside the case. There was a rumour going around a while ago that one of the cards (can't recall if it was 79 series or r29 series) supposedly had amd contacting multiple companies to design a stock heatsink for it and the best design would be on the card. Apparently turned out to be BS but all the same if amd are unable to do a good job of it, seems to be a move that they should give some thought to.

The difference between stock amd designs and stock NVidia designs is there for all to see, compare the cooler which started out on the 690gtx and had variations for the titan and 780 compared to what amd had for the 7900 series and forward to where we are today. The NVidia designs just seem to have much more thought applied to them, whereas amd seem content to use an annoying cooler design that should have been taken out the back and given a good kicking years ago.

"Cool", quiet and dump the heat out the back, that's whats needed and its about time amd took note of this instead of recycling a cooler that's long outstayed its welcome. They said the 6990 was cool and quiet, it wasn't. They said the 7990 was cool and quiet, it wasn't. Time to get the thumb out.

I get the impression that whatever department they have to predict on how thier products might be received by user and the media; they don't have the right staff in it or they ain't listening to their own internal advice.

Nvidia know whats what, that cooler works well, its well made and it looks great, it cannot be faulted.
Without even comparing AMD's reference cooler to Nvidia, just on its own merits it does not do a good job, and I feel the way it looks can be described as "A Little Tacky"

AMD should know enthusiasts take pride in their rigs, some ppl will go for Nvidia's cooler just because it looks good while AMD's looks like something from 2006.

And then the performance of it, they are used for CF. some ppl are going to be put off AMD multi GPU just because they don't like the only available cooler.

When then reviewers get hold of it, all they will say is "its hot, its loud, its crap"
Inevitably that gets twisted by Fanboys in into "AMD are hot, loud and crap"
How many times in here alone have members said "AMD are hot and loud" without qualifying the reference cooler.

All of these things are easily predictable by people who understand this market, how is it that seemingly AMD didn't predict any of this?

Give the job to me, i would never have let that cooler out the door on any GPU.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why AMD can't just borrow a proven cooler design? Here are the roadblocks I can see:

- They have stated OEMs demand blowers: OK so license a blower design

- Licensing costs eating into margins: OK so steal a blower design

As humbug said, absolutely baffling.
 
With a bit of luck they have learned that lesson.

Take the 295X2, it has a solid metal shroud, it looks quite good with its red LED fan, the Radeon logo on the top which lights up and the styling is not bad at all.
And it works very well, its does a good job of keeping it all cool.
Reviewers couldn't and didn't fault it.

They also seemed to have listened to someone.
Just before it went on sale it still had the Grill over the fan with Radeon written on it, i did contact them as others did and said "please take that Grill off, its horrible and ruins the look of the card"

Which they did.

Before:



After:



Much better.
 
No offense humbug but that card certainly does not look good, or even close :p Maybe if we were in the 80s :D

My personal opinion anywho
 
I like the design of the card itself. But tbh the aio rad looks like a home users ghetto mod.
 
I like the design of the card itself. But tbh the aio rad looks like a home users ghetto mod.

I would have had the pipes for the rad closer together and coming out near the rear top of the card.

Not so spread out on either side of the logo in the centre.
 
Would look a bit better yes, but even still i think it wouldn't be the most elegant looking solution. Im guessing space for fans was an issue, as a triple type solution like that found on msi lightnings or gigabyte windforce looks much better.
 
Would look a bit better yes, but even still i think it wouldn't be the most elegant looking solution. Im guessing space for fans was an issue, as a triple type solution like that found on msi lightnings or gigabyte windforce looks much better.

Then you have the problem with the heat being dumped into your case raising temps of other components. The only real ideal solution is a blower which exhausts the heat as well as being quiet, but near impossible to do with the cores on the 295x2.
 
Very interesting Boom:) you always seem to hit the forum first with these updates:cool: inside informant:confused: you can tell us you're amongst discreet friends:p:D

Does this design tell us anything about Maxwell as such? (efficiency/power) or is it mainly about design?

Is this a hint at the possible power of the new fan:eek:

25nPWK8.gif

:p well it could pull in a few buyers:D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom