So how do you know all this? Been to Africa to hunt yourself, or just reading it all from her FB page? If that's the case then why sit on the lion with a bow? I'm sure with all the money her family has she could use a supersoaker 100 if she really wanted.
She needs to be stopped!!!
- Thread starter Edward78
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 6,586
The lion was actually shot with a bow, it was done to stop it killing off cubs.
You do have to hit the heart area at the front, which is pretty easy given that you would have to be very close to see it in the bush. It's likely to be a one shot kill, taking under a minute to die.
She would have paid over $30,000 to kill that lion
I wouldn't support that type of hunting, there is too much suffering involved.
There is a pathetic **** on Youtube shooting from the back of a truck, dropped his first arrow and was lucky not to hit the ground his aim was shaking so much. If you are as bad at using a bow as he was then you shouldn't be part of this.
/
You do have to hit the heart area at the front, which is pretty easy given that you would have to be very close to see it in the bush. It's likely to be a one shot kill, taking under a minute to die.
She would have paid over $30,000 to kill that lion
I wouldn't support that type of hunting, there is too much suffering involved.
There is a pathetic **** on Youtube shooting from the back of a truck, dropped his first arrow and was lucky not to hit the ground his aim was shaking so much. If you are as bad at using a bow as he was then you shouldn't be part of this.
/
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 6,586
Can't embed it because of couple of swears 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVTmt1pa7xI
Listen to the bloke Louis is talking to, both sides of the net get what they want. The yanks with loads of money get their rare kill to put on the wall, and animal lovers still have their rare species
(oh yeah, and the 'breeders' get money to breed)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVTmt1pa7xI
Listen to the bloke Louis is talking to, both sides of the net get what they want. The yanks with loads of money get their rare kill to put on the wall, and animal lovers still have their rare species
(oh yeah, and the 'breeders' get money to breed
)
Do you think the sort of person to practice their right to open carry their rifle is the sort of person that's going to go shoot up a school because a student posted some pictures with animals she's shot?
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,468
I don't see that actually.
She has certain features which are beyond normal highly aesthic boundaries, but Rhianna has a bigger forehead and doesn't get the same critism.
Wow, get out more dude your sense of humour is failing badly.
Studies have shown Facebook attracts narcissistic type personalities, why else is she parading these images of herself which she knows is going to anger people.
If her goal is so noble and wants to protect the wildlife through controlled culling surely there's no need to seek publicity out of it. She clearly doesn't have an ounce of humility about her.
Last edited:
I think the main problem for me is not so much that she does it, its an important services she is doing. It's the posing on camera with the dead animal after, as if she does it for 'fun'. She needs to learn to do her job with a bit of humility and people won't jump down her throat so much. What she's doing here is a touch inappropriate.
It's like a surgeon taking a selfi in the middle of an operation, giving a thumbs up in front of an open chest after just replacing a heart. It wouldn't be the right thing to do
And looks wise she looks like the opera singer out of The Fifth Element
Last edited:
or a surfer having a picture of them ona wave, or a parachutist making a video ooo or even a guy taking pictures of himself building a pc for a "project l,log"
shock horror as people like to document their hobbies.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
But you could easily say the same thing about a gay man posting pictures of himself in a gay club kissing another guy. Now, more acceptable but could easily still draw lots of hate on Facebook, but posting a picture like that even 10 years ago would get almost the same response this woman has received.
Ignorant reactions is NOT a valid reason to not share what you do, in fact, it's taught more people the benefits of what she is doing. There are now what dozens of people in this thread that previously didn't know that wild game hunting is actively helping to support conservation of these animals. She doesn't post, these people don't learn that information.
The first gay guy showing the world his kiss with another man on facebook, might attract the same response but also leads to other people being more comfortable to do the same.
Meat eaters enjoy the result of animals being killed. Apparently it's okay to have an animal killed and to enjoy the taste of it, but it's not okay to enjoy killing an animal. Just an arbitrary, meaningless line that people randomly make up, it's okay to like this but horrendous to like that, even though the result is a dead animal in both cases.
Other peoples ignorance is a terrible reason to chose not to post what she did.
Of course, I find the argument that they help conservation rather stupid. They could pay the money purely for the conservation, and the people running these area's could simply tranq the problematic animals(like those who would attack other packs cubs) and transport them to an effectively old animals sanctuary.
Yes one hobby can pay for something good, but they could just as easily pay without the hunting and achieve the same result. It's a shame that it's just not seen as important, because if Bill Gates or someone donated a billion or, 5, we could pretty much world wide have safe places to work on repopulating endangered species.
Last edited:
Gates is busy increasing the population in Africa, which has a direct relationship on habit loss for these animals.
Personally I'd rather have a few more Rhinos and a bit less financial advice from Nigerian Princes.
If he thinks Africans will recognise the economic benefit of wildlife before they are made extinct, he's kidding himself.
All the progress made so far has been at the instigation of the West.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 6,632
There's no rhinos in Nigeria. Stop generalising an entire continent.
But there are Rhinos in Nigeria
That muslim group Boko Haram are happily shooting them right now, they poach about 3 tons a month in ivory.
Name me something that we need Africa for, other than housing wildlife.