Oh and the 2 hours it takes someone to comprehensively train a cafe worker![]()


Oh and the 2 hours it takes someone to comprehensively train a cafe worker![]()
Essentially your girlfriend (no marriage?)Your taking a lot of stick for this comment, im pretty sure you were asking a question there.
I dont know anything about the rights of a pregnant woman, so im not going to input.
I'm sorry, but I can see how the owner of the business would be extremely ****ed off.
Essentially your girlfriend (no marriage?) has made someone pay for her decision, and if its a small business it's going to impact massively upon their financial situation.
You can see how people can be reluctant to hire certain demographics.
Don't get me wrong, if someone works hard for a company and has done a few years, then its a different kettle of fish entirely, and the company in my opinion has a social obligation.
But this timescale is just a **** take.
Ditto.That is not the point though. The business owner will no doubt feel aggrieved that they have employed someone who was already in the early stages of pregnancy.
It is things like this that can cripple a small business.
I know numerous people that run small businesses and whilst it is not discussed openly, I know for a fact that women of a certain age are less likely to get a job with them due to this type of issue.
This is the reason small business get utterly shafted by this legislation.
A company barley afloat cant afford the extra burden.
I would never employ a 'young woman' on these grounds.
Its a totally different story for a bigger company but 1 or 2 man bands should keep well away.
If it is a small employer, they actually get paid more back than they pay out in SMP.
Employers can claim back statutory maternity pay up to £45k plus like 4% (iirc) for the trouble.Explain this bit to me please.
Hi all,
TL: DR - GF announces she is preggers to boss, boss turns into mega-*****
What are her rights ?
Thanks for reading![]()
1. What you can reclaim
As an employer, you can usually reclaim 92% of employees’ Statutory Maternity (SMP), Paternity and Adoption Pay.
You can reclaim 103% if your business qualifies for Small Employers’ Relief. You get this if you paid less than £45,000 in Class 1 National Insurance in the last complete tax year before the qualifying or matching week (or the official notification for overseas adoptions).
btw this is wrong...
should read..
TL: DR - GF gets preggers, starts a new job the following week, Boss acts accordingly by being ****ed off![]()
Employers can claim back statutory maternity pay up to £45k plus like 4% (iirc) for the trouble.
I think after £45k there's a drop or something.
Edit: Was wrong, haven't looked at that **** in years. They can claim it back though.
is your GF definitely going back to this job once her maternity leave is over?
or is the employer going to be messed around with having to hire temps while the job is being held for your GF, only for the employer to have to find another full time member in a few months time?
That is not the point though. The business owner will no doubt feel aggrieved that they have employed someone who was already in the early stages of pregnancy.
It is things like this that can cripple a small business.
I know numerous people that run small businesses and whilst it is not discussed openly, I know for a fact that women of a certain age are less likely to get a job with them due to this type of issue.
Now I work for a very large company at present. We are all being made redundant unless we get redeployed and we were told some time ago about our exit dates.
Guess what happened? The amount of the females that got pregnant was quite unbelievable. Three went on maternity in the last month just weeks before their exit date and you know why.
yeah, it is is standard practice in small business not to hire married women in the 25-38 category -or at let it will be discussed at hiring time.
Even ignoring the financial side (which is not big) the disruption is very difficult. The biggest issue is the need to maintain their job position so you can't hire a full time replacement but need a temp worker - which in anything remotely technical is impossible.
The upshot is if you are interviewing 2 candidates, a 28 YO women married for the last 3 without children and a man, there has to be a very big reason to hire the women over the man.
What excuses do companies use to hire the man though? You're going to need a fairly good reason as to why the man was better for the job otherwise you'd lose if they claimed discrimination, which many be difficult to come up with if both applicants are equally good.
What excuses do companies use to hire the man though? You're going to need a fairly good reason as to why the man was better for the job otherwise you'd lose if they claimed discrimination, which many be difficult to come up with if both applicants are equally good.
I expect this sort of situation happens quite often though where the man gets the job because he won't be getting pregnant. It's not about not discriminating, it's about not being seen to discriminate. Might be wrong but companies don't want the hassle and if they can get away with it then they will.