Apollo45

rocks that were ejected naturally from the lunar surface by cratering events and subsequently fell to Earth as lunar meteorites

So how do you account for the mirrors on the surface of the moon that were placed there so that we could track from Earth the distance between us and the moon that is ever so slightly, year on year, increasing ?
 
GtNqv1Z.jpg



The Eagle Prepares to Land

The Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle, in a landing configuration was photographed in lunar orbit from the Command and Service Module Columbia. Inside the module were Commander Neil A. Armstrong and Lunar Module Pilot Buzz Aldrin. The long rod-like protrusions under the landing pods are lunar surface sensing probes. Upon contact with the lunar surface, the probes sent a signal to the crew to shut down the descent engine.
 
People that think we never went to the moon are morons. Two of the biggest nuclear super powers trying to get there first. You think if one or the other faked it, they would keep quiet about the fakery? Unless they're both in on it. *Dons tinfoil fedora* CHEMTRAILS MAN! CHEMTRAILS!
 
People that think we never went to the moon are morons. Two of the biggest nuclear super powers trying to get there first. You think if one or the other faked it, they would keep quiet about the fakery? Unless they're both in on it. *Dons tinfoil fedora* CHEMTRAILS MAN! CHEMTRAILS!

This to me is why it is so damn certain that it is not faked.

The USSR would have been doing everything they possibly could to discredit the moon landings. If they did not happen, it would have come out. Soviet telescopes and tracking stations would have monitored every second of that mission.

That and it would have involved thousands of people lying for 45 years.

And that to fake it they still had to develop and build the actual rockets, if you're going to do that, may as well actually send them out.
 
This to me is why it is so damn certain that it is not faked.

The USSR would have been doing everything they possibly could to discredit the moon landings. If they did not happen, it would have come out. Soviet telescopes and tracking stations would have monitored every second of that mission.

That and it would have involved thousands of people lying for 45 years.

And that to fake it they still had to develop and build the actual rockets, if you're going to do that, may as well actually send them out.

Exactly, if they had been faked in any way there is no way the Soviets would have let them get away with it. It happened, saying otherwise is just crazy talk.
 
Also, nearly 400,000 Americans were involved in the moon landing missions. If it were faked, at least some of them would have come forward with evidence. None have.
 
Why is the 45th anniversary significant?

What I mean is did we have a thread on the 44th? and will we have one on the 46th?

It's all about karma and latent energy lines within the earth. 45 is like the 42 from Douglas Adams. We've moved on from 42. 45 is our new overlord.
 
Every 5years they make it a bit bigger celebration.

Plus they're trying to drum up interest and support for the SLS missions to deep space.
 
Last edited:
So why wouldn't buzz swear on the bible that he had been on the moon?
instead he refuses and attempts to assassinate the guy

It isn't as simple as refusing to swear on the Bible. You need to look at the psychology of the situation.

Imagine you have 99.999999% of the world's population hailing you as the guy who's been on the moon, you'd get well ****ing angry if some random guy came up to and made you swear that you did it. In some people's minds, swearing on the bible would devalue the thing they achieved. But for some people they would just laugh it off and swear on it.

Imagine you did something great, and someone saw you doing it. Then a month later that same person who saw you doing it asked you to swear you did it. You'd be instantly annoyed.

You need to analyse that video from a neutral perspective. Not from a preconception that Buzz is lying.
 
Last edited:
So why wouldn't buzz swear on the bible that he had been on the moon?
instead he refuses and attempts to assassinate the guy

He didn't attempt to assassinate the guy, he just punched him the face. Why the need for hyperbole ? Why should he swear on the bible ? What makes the bible the arbiter of truth ? It's just a book full of abhorrent teachings that most intelligent people disregard.

If you're arguing that the moon landings were faked, simply because a fundamentalist Christian accosted Buzz and got punched in the face for his efforts, then you're nuts.

Thinking you're trolling now. No one is this dumb and still able to type. :confused:
 
if we were able to get to the moon 45 years ago then why has no people have left earth orbit on NASA missions since? it makes no sense.

Anyone who has played kerbal knows it has no logic
 
Back
Top Bottom