It's a myth, go through the body stats of many athletes, sports people, who have very little body fat % you will find that the majority of them are in the healthy range of BMI.
There are exceptions body builders for example, but using them as a justification for being fat is silly.
His BMI figure is around 40 something, but I am curious as to what his body fat % figure is.
In my opinion for measuring "health" the body fat percentage tells a bigger story.
Probably high teens. Which is fine for a male.
Absolutely not. I am a healthy 24 on the (inaccurate) BMI scale, but on the real life scale, no as I hit the gym, swim and run, 3 times a week.
I love it, feeling great is the best thing and @ 32 I'm teetering on the edge of a health cliff, I think at close to 40 it's sooo important to exercise, verses my mid teens.
I see it in a lot of my friends who have beer/kebab guts.
Are you some sort of bot?Absolutely no. I am a healthy 24 on the (inaccurate) BMI scale, but on the real life scale, no as I hit the gym, swim and run, 3 times a week.
I love it, feeling great is the best thing and @ 32 I'm teetering on the edge of a health cliff, I think at close to 40 it's sooo important to exercise, verses my mid teens.
False.
Will have to pull you up on that one. Simply not true.
Agreed. I think people get caught up trying to look like celebrities.
If you have a very high percentage of muscle mass but a very low percentage of body fat then that can be considered quite bad for you too. The reason why Hafþór Júlíus Björnsson is big around the middle is because he needs to be in order to lift heavy things. The body fat that he has on him is in areas designed to support his large frame, like his lower back for example (a notorious spot for injury when lifting). And are completely natural and healthy.
If you want to be able lift heavy things, then go to the gym a lot. If you want to have less body fat, then (essentially) eat less and do cardio. If you want to look like a celebrity (i.e. high muscle mass %, low body fat %) then that's a whole other ball game, consisting of a lot of yoyo style training of (basic example) 6 months muscle building followed by 6 months weight loss training.
SNIP
Mathematician Keith Devlin and the restaurant industry association Center for Consumer Freedom argue that the error in the BMI is significant and so pervasive that it is not generally useful in evaluation of health. University of Chicago political science professor Eric Oliver says BMI is a convenient but inaccurate measure of weight, forced onto the populace, and should be revised.
His is mainly subdermal bodyfat which isn't really a big issue anyway. He's naturally a "big" guy, from the exercise he does and his diet, he's actually pretty healthy, he's just congenitally massive! Lucky git.
Most definitely, cannot do much about that until I move out though.
I agree with these experts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index
Agreed! He's my age as well. Which makes me wonder what I've been doing with my life to not look that good
![]()
But, in my experience, the only people who say that BMI is ********, are the fat people trying to make themselves feel better.
It's not perfect, I never said it was, but BMI + Body Fat gives a very telling picture.
And for the majority of people, since most people are not at the extremes of body build BMI is more than suitable, that doesn't mean that being a healthy BMI with a beer belly is "healthy" that is ludicrous.
But, in my experience, the only people who say that BMI is ********, are the fat people trying to make themselves feel better.