Nation of meat eating animal lovers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SkodaMart
  • Start date Start date
porushinobu said:
indeed, all we have ehard so far is his mention of older meat eaters being obese
Click to expand...

Yeah, and even those studies are flawed highly, as they are comparing your everyday typical person who will be consuming utter crap in the form of ready meals, to someone who at least puts a semblance of thought into what they're putting in their bodies.
 
TheBDog said:
The cost is irrelevant to you


Well, precisely. Meat isn't inherently bad for you. But convenience food tends to be. Not for it's meat content though(though quality can have an effect, the effect isn't quite so bad as the crazy levels of salt etc that come with convenience food).
Click to expand...

As always we seem to agree. :)
 
This veggie-thread almost reads like those door-to-door Christians.

BELIEVE IN CHRISTIANITY?

Why?

BECAUSE GOD!

Just waiting for the PETA flag to be risen and a huge "MEAT IS MURDER" poster to be erected.
 
cheesyboy said:
He's not being hypocritical.

He's not defending his position on dairy: he's saying it's wrong. It's a weakness of his and something he seems to struggle to reconcile.

The hypocrisy elsewhere is the discrepancy between the value of life placed on a few dozen unwanted dogs when compared with millions of farmed animals. Many of which are significantly more intelligent than dogs, or significantly cleaner than dogs, or (arguably) rather more "cute".
Click to expand...

What about defending his use of everyday products and items that contain products from the slaughter industry?
 
M3G4UK said:
Read it again, and it's still nonsense.

Regardless of it is a pet or not, it would still be eating meat. It's a moot point.
Click to expand...

If it wasn't a pet it wouldn't exist. It's not a difficult concept to grasp.

Or do you really think we'd have 16 million cats and dogs just roaming around wild?
 
SkodaMart said:
Many obese people are fat because of eating an excess of meat, animal fat and animal products.

Study a chronically obese persons diet.

It's never mangos and bananas is it?
Click to expand...

My cousin's son is a veggie and he's a fat ****er. So your point is void.
 
porushinobu said:
As always we seem to agree. :)
Click to expand...

*brofist*

Also,

grigliata-mista_zpsfe640c9b.jpg


That is all
 
JRS said:
So you're a hypocrite then?

I mean, surely if your principle about not eating meat actually meant anything to you, then you'd rather starve than eat an animal?

You strike me as the absolute worst kind of vegetarian - the ones who won't eat meat 'because it's cruel!!!111oneoneeleven' and love to preach to others about why they shouldn't eat all the little cuddly animals but would drop the idea if it looked like they might go hungry.

And for that reason - I'm out.

Think I'll have pork ribs tonight....
Click to expand...

In the modern world humans do not need to eat meat.

I have already suggested that it's OK for carnivorous animals that need meat to survive.

Let's assume for example there was another ice age and the only food available was meat.

Oh no, not me chaps, I will wait for my crops to grow..

Get real, I would eat meat, just that I have a choice and enjoy exercising it.

The entire point of this thread was that people were up in arms because of 43 dogs dying in an arson attack, I'm trying to highlight that animal cruelty is all around us and this attack is trivial in comparison.
 
M3G4UK said:
Read it again, and it's still nonsense.

Regardless of it is a pet or not, it would still be eating meat. It's a moot point.
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll keep it simple, for idiots.

Pets, like domestic cats, only exist because people keep pets. There is a market for buying cats, so producers produce them.

By buying a cat, you are paying the industry to produce cats. That extra cat of yours now needs feeding. You feed it meat, because it requires it. All that meat you feed it, wouldn't need to be produced buy the meat industry if you didn't buy your cat in the first place.

Hence, owning a meat-eating pet causes animals to die so that it may be fed.

Understand?
 
SkodaMart said:
I'm doing my part.

I don't eat meat.

That's one less person taking the flesh of another animal unnecessarily.

The more that follow the better without a doubt. Fact.

That's good enough for me.
Click to expand...

But you consume dairy, which you think is overall worse, so...

You also will be using products derived from animal slaughter on a daily basis too, so...

Also, making a statement and putting "fact" after it doesn't actually make it into a fact.
 
Last edited:
Haggisman said:
If it wasn't a pet it wouldn't exist. It's not a difficult concept to grasp.

Or do you really think we'd have 16 million cats and dogs just roaming around wild?
Click to expand...

Erm... we'd still have cats and dogs? Maybe not as much, but they'd still be here, being self centered and eating meat, continuing the meat eating tyranny. :rolleyes:
 
cheesyboy said:
Ok, I'll keep it simple, for idiots.

Pets, like domestic cats, only exist because people keep pets. There is a market for buying cats, so producers produce them.

By buying a cat, you are paying the industry to produce cats. That extra cat of yours now needs feeding. You feed it meat, because it requires it. All that meat you feed it, wouldn't need to be produced buy the meat industry if you didn't buy your cat in the first place.

Hence, owning a meat-eating pet causes animals to die so that it may be fed.

Understand?
Click to expand...

Oh I understood from the onset. I just couldn't quite believe you'd made such a ridiculous point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom