Second Tory MP defects to UKIP

Most of the population don't vote Tory, didn't you know that ? Hence this farcical coalition government.

most of the population has never voted for the government in power as far as i'm aware. in fact it's incredibly unlikely they ever will.
 
Maybe people would take ukip seriously if they had any policies other then them foreign tke our jerbs

I guess you missed the talk at the recent UKIP conference. Things like tax cuts with no tax on the minimum wage and no inheritance tax.

Also, foreigners are taking jobs with large scale immigration which has caused strain to schooling, healthcare, infrastructure, housing, social issues, crime etc etc. So what, just turn a blind eye and pretend its not happening? And if you do say something get called an idiot or your above quote? Isn't really a good defence of your views now is it? Or maybe its the only defence you have.
 
I guess you missed the talk at the recent UKIP conference. Things like tax cuts with no tax on the minimum wage and no inheritance tax.

that's actually quite an intesting pair of policies.

now is that riasing the tax free alowance to the equiilent of the minimum wage so it applies to everyone or just not taxing people who earn minimum age
 
I guess you missed the talk at the recent UKIP conference. Things like tax cuts with no tax on the minimum wage and no inheritance tax.

Also, foreigners are taking jobs with large scale immigration which has caused strain to schooling, healthcare, infrastructure, housing, social issues, crime etc etc. So what, just turn a blind eye and pretend its not happening? And if you do say something get called an idiot or your above quote? Isn't really a good defence of your views now is it? Or maybe its the only defence you have.

you're quite right there, all the people who are pushing for the continuation of open borders are naive beyond belief.
 
[TW]Fox;26972658 said:
Doesn't that make the assumption that the overseas aid budget is purely a philanthropy thing, which I somewhat doubt it is?

dump the philanthropy bit keep the bribery bit tbh a fair bit of it is utterly pointless because we're trying to meet arbitrary % of gdp targets
 
0.7% of GNI is the target, which we're meeting iirc. But it's a drop in the ocean in terms of government expenditure.

17.6 billion aint exactly nothing is it thats about 15% of the nhs yearly budget.

everyone keeps up this stupid argument "oh these savings are all just small bit so its not worth bothering"

so what is thew giant saving we should be making? cause if you cant find one its lots of small things.
 
[TW]Fox;26972303 said:
Is not a tax.

The Bedroom Tax is the commonly used name for it; get over it.

Do you think its a good idea to pay for single people to live in 4 bedroom houses?

Quite apart from the red-herring nature of your objection I think it's a better idea than (a) paying more money to move them into private accommodation, (b) breaking up communities and the support networks they bring, (c) stopping divorced parents from having bedrooms so that their children can stay for the weekend, (d) charging people because their partners/children serving overseas in our military got killed in action, (e) charging disabled people extra to have a room where a carer can stay the night, etc., etc.

And that would all be true even if the bedroom tax was moving people out of their "under-occupied" homes which, of course, it's almost entirely failed to do for the strikingly simple reason that there aren't smaller houses to put them into. Council housing was deliberately built to provide homes for life, accepting that most households will fluctuate in size over the years, and so they never built much in the way of housing for singles and couples.

The bedroom tax is particularly repellent given that the major reason for the problem in the first place is that the last Tory government destroyed the provision of council housing (although, to be fair, Blair's government hardly did anything to solve the problem).
 
I guess you missed the talk at the recent UKIP conference. Things like tax cuts with no tax on the minimum wage and no inheritance tax.

Also, foreigners are taking jobs with large scale immigration which has caused strain to schooling, healthcare, infrastructure, housing, social issues, crime etc etc. So what, just turn a blind eye and pretend its not happening? And if you do say something get called an idiot or your above quote? Isn't really a good defence of your views now is it? Or maybe its the only defence you have.

Ukip conference was just farage showboating that Tory defector. I'm sure they will enjoy their 3 MPs in May, they are a long long way off Tory and labour in terms of numbers and finances. They can't even field in every seat, a fringe party on par with the greens and maybe fibdems but that's it at best
 
The Bedroom Tax is the commonly used name for it; get over it.

Of course it's the commonly used name for it - it's a misleadingly emotive term which makes it sound worse than it is and makes it easier to stir up emotions on the subject. A tax on bedrooms? Awful!

The bedroom tax is particularly repellent given that the major reason for the problem in the first place is that the last Tory government destroyed the provision of council housing (although, to be fair, Blair's government hardly did anything to solve the problem).

I think we can all agree that destroying the provision of council housing in the 80's was a very bad idea, but you can't honestly be suggesting now that because 30 years ago the Tories screwed something up they cannot take any steps to try and deal with the resulting issues?
 
We were taught some maths at high school, percentages and all, now it may be a coalition government, however, it seems that quite a lot of people voted Tory at the last GE, so how does that equate with, 'most of the population...'?

Are you saying ,most of the population voted Tory at the last GE ? ;)

By population we mean electorate. Just added this for clarity. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom