Ryse: Son of Rome GPU performance benchmark

[Gregster]

Recent poor Nvidia 0day driver support?

Where did he say that?

Nice Ninja

 

[Silent_Scone]

Yeh he does that a lot lol...

 

[James J]

Recent poor Nvidia 0day driver support?

Partly true, but mostly for SLI setups though in a few of the recent big launch titles. There isn't a driver optimised for this game yet, so when that hits, we can expect the results to be higher than they are at the moment.

 

[humbug]

More or less just stating the obvious lol.

The 290 dips quite a lot in the opening sequence.

Didn't expect the cliche crew to pick up on that though

That looked better in your signature, put it back

 

[hyperseven]

Just fired it up and no inbuilt benchmarking tool
Not even that many graphics options, although has built in super sampling option.

 

[user100monkey]

Any one worked out the best settings for the 970 with this game?

I am running 1920*1200 texture very high everything else on high with vsync on temportal anti enable and filtering to 8x fraps reporting 52fps.
Which is odd as with vsync on i thought that would be 30fps if sub 60?

 

[Dicehunter]

No built in benchmarking tool is a no sale for me

 

[user100monkey]

it is odd Dicehunter that there is no built in benchmarking tool i and i think a lot of people were expecting one, crytek even stated it would become the new pc benchmark in there PR release

“We are bringing the Ryse experience to PC, with 4K resolution support,” says Carl Jones, Director of Business Development at Crytek. “4K gaming is another leap in graphics quality for PC gamers and Ryse is the perfect showcase for what’s now possible in high-end PC games. We’ve given our team the opportunity to show what CRYENGINE can really achieve, without compromising quality, thanks to the incredible hardware available now to PC gamers. Ryse will be a benchmark PC graphics showcase this year and probably for a long time in future. Our community asked for a Ryse PC version, and we have the means and technology to deliver this title with the highest quality possible.”

 

[Martini1991]

Think I need more than a single 290X to max this at 2560x1080 for proper enjoyable game play.
Oh well, 20nm I'm counting on you. Really don't want a dual GPU config.

 

[Dicehunter]

it is odd Dicehunter that there is no built in benchmarking tool i and i think a lot of people were expecting one, crytek even stated it would become the new pc benchmark in there PR release

“We are bringing the Ryse experience to PC, with 4K resolution support,” says Carl Jones, Director of Business Development at Crytek. “4K gaming is another leap in graphics quality for PC gamers and Ryse is the perfect showcase for what’s now possible in high-end PC games. We’ve given our team the opportunity to show what CRYENGINE can really achieve, without compromising quality, thanks to the incredible hardware available now to PC gamers. Ryse will be a benchmark PC graphics showcase this year and probably for a long time in future. Our community asked for a Ryse PC version, and we have the means and technology to deliver this title with the highest quality possible.”

I think they meant how the first Crysis was a graphical benchmark not an actual benchmarking option, Probably applies here as well but they could maybe implement a built in benchmark with an update

 

[Martini1991]

Ryse will never be the next Crysis.
I like Ryse, it looks good. But it only looks as good as it does because of how simplistic it is.

 

[Dicehunter]

Ryse will never be the next Crysis.
I like Ryse, it looks good. But it only looks as good as it does because of how simplistic it is.

True, Would still be nice to have a built in benchmark though

 

[Silent_Scone]

Think I need more than a single 290X to max this at 2560x1080 for proper enjoyable game play.
Oh well, 20nm I'm counting on you. Really don't want a dual GPU config.

2560x1080 is barely many more pixels than 1080p. I hardly noticed any performance difference.

 

[gpuerrilla]

As an AMD user im happy to see the game performing well, its just a shame its a mediocre at best game.

+1 I heard a while back it was a poor game (looking good doesnt mean it's a great game) good to see the console hardware choice is trickling through though for AMD owners.

 

[Martini1991]

2560x1080 is barely many more pixels than 1080p. I hardly noticed any performance difference.

Sure, in most games, but I was doing the supersampling in this too. IQ was brilliant, performance wasn't.

 

[africanos23]

4K won't be playable imo on any single cards. Even with driver updates I highly doubt it.

Here are some of my benches with frametimes on a
Msi Gaming R9-290 , Galax Gtx970 Exoc and GTX680 all stock

http://www.hardwarepal.com/ryse-son-rome-benchmark/

This is 4K low btw

 

[Kaapstad]

4K won't be playable imo on any single cards. Even with driver updates I highly doubt it.

Here are some of my benches with frametimes on a
Msi Gaming R9-290 , Galax Gtx970 Exoc and GTX680 all stock


This is 4K low btw

This game is not playable at any resolution on any setup as long as the game devs limit it to around 60fps.

 

[africanos23]

This game is not playable at any resolution on any setup as long as the game devs limit it to around 60fps.

Well on 4K the highest refresh rate is 60hz as long as its near that it should be fine.

 

[Kaapstad]

Well on 4K the highest refresh rate is 60hz as long as its near that it should be fine.

It is not the refresh rate that is the problem, it is the minimums.

I would rather have 140fps @4K in BF4 on a 60htz monitor than be limited to 60fps and dips for the minimums.

 

[africanos23]

It is not the refresh rate that is the problem, it is the minimums.

I would rather have 140fps @4K in BF4 on a 60htz monitor than be limited to 60fps and dips for the minimums.

The way these ports are going and some strange limitations you never know if even 60fps will be a thing of the past.