Queen Elizabeth murder plot foiled

Hmmm, why have I found this on the New Zealand news site and nothing on the BBC site?

I don't believe it's always in our best interest to report on these things. Look at the USA over the last 10 years and how much fear people have of terrorist attacks.
 
Lots of people have more material wealth than me. I'm not jealous about it.

As for the whole citizens vs subjects, what difference would that make to me?

A citizen accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politic, defending it with his life, a subject does not!
 
For many it's the concept of inherited positions by birthright, namely the head of state which goes against the very principles of equality.

It's maintenance is based on tradition, something which unless it can be suitable justified as to why it should continue isn't valuable from my perspective (along with many other people who would prefer to live in a nation without a Royal Family). Support for the Monarch is actually well distributed across all socioeconomic groups (as is the preference to remove it) - pretty much refuting the popular argument it's just poor people being jealous, the only really strong correlation with monarchy support which stands out is Conservative leaning over 50's (which this thread is a good indicator of this trend).

Over time support will begin to dwindle, like many things of this nature it's a generational thing.
 
Last edited:
I do see why people question it though. They're just a symbol of the UK and don't actually do anything except consume tax payers money!

Just like a president in countries like Germany, Ireland etc?

Yes they do. They get tens of millions per year from the sovereign support grant, we pay for the upkeep of palaces, the police foot the bill for their security etc etc. They're estimated to cost us about 300 million per year.

I'm not saying that's a bad thing mind you as i don't know how much money they bring to the country to balance that.

As many people have already said, It's the Queen's own money that she pays to the government in the first place. It's not a case of money from tourism - it's simply a case that the monarchy costs us nothing.
 
Last edited:
Lots of people have more material wealth than me. I'm not jealous about it.

As for the whole citizens vs subjects, what difference would that make to me?

Neither am I? Your point ?


The issue is birthright and the fact that we have no true rights as long as the monarch remains nor can we be considered a true democracy, which in 2014 is frankly ridiculous
 
Over time support will begin to dwindle, like many things of this nature it's a generational thing.

I don't think that's the case. The monarchy have an ace up their sleeves which is William and Kate, they are very popular both domestically with the new generations and internationally.
 
The issue is birthright and the fact that we have no true rights as long as the monarch remains nor can we be considered a true democracy, which in 2014 is frankly ridiculous

We have plenty of rights, which is why we live in a constitutional monarchy not a dictatorship.
 
The issue is birthright and the fact that we have no true rights as long as the monarch remains nor can we be considered a true democracy, which in 2014 is frankly ridiculous
When was the last time a monarch actually overturned a decision of our government? I don't see it as an actual problem. The whole outcome of the restoration of the monarchy after Cromwell was that the people wielded power over the Crown, not the other way round. If anything it was the reason why we didn't get shot of the monarchy when pretty much all the other nations did 100 - 150 years ago.

Personally I think getting rid of the monarchy because of birthright issues is just cutting off our nose to spite our face.
 
Yet people complain about council housing, the monarch and her inbred family live in the most expensive social housing In the world. Don't you all want to be citizens instead of subjects?

I am a British Citizen, not a British Subject. So are you. Very few people are Subjects since 1983.
 
I don't think that's the case. The monarchy have an ace up their sleeves which is William and Kate, they are very popular both domestically with the new generations and internationally.
Looking at the poll data on support for a republic shows clear signs of generation changes in attitude.

Support for a republic by age band.

18-34 - 18%
35-54 - 15%
55+ - 9%

https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/ipsos-mori-diamond-jubilee-poll-may-2012-tables.pdf

Interestingly support for a republic is highest in London (20%) & lowest in the Midlands (9%) & unsurprisingly the lowest support comes from Conservative supports (3%).
 
Looking at the poll data on support for a republic shows clear signs of generation changes in attitude.

Support for a republic by age band.

18-34 - 18%
35-54 - 15%
55+ - 9%

https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/ipsos-mori-diamond-jubilee-poll-may-2012-tables.pdf

Interestingly support for a republic is highest in London (20%) & lowest in the Midlands (9%) & unsurprisingly the lowest support comes from Conservative supports (3%).

I'd need to see trend data to be able to draw a conclusion.
 
Personally I think as people get older they'll be less emotional and more pragmatic about it so I don't see us facing a surge in anti-monarchy sentiment as the years go by.
 
Back
Top Bottom