So the black criminal thread got deleted because racism?
Lol, since when are stats saying something racist...
It went fast. Why isn't this one deleted as well? no wait.....
So the black criminal thread got deleted because racism?
Lol, since when are stats saying something racist...
Explain how the BBC article is racist? It is a statement of fact, by definition is cannot be racist. The BBC didn't say anything about white British being lazy or dumb, that was the OP.
It went fast. Why isn't this one deleted as well? no wait.....
To imply that an entire ethnicity of people is x and y is racist.
It is also non sense, there are millions of white british who are not dumb and lazy, obviously. It is just a ridiculous racist argument coming out the left at the moment to try and counter the anti-eu anti-massimigration
So the black criminal thread got deleted because racism?
Lol, since when are stats saying something racist...
Again, where does the BBC article state that ALL white British people are lazy or dumb? It doesn't!
Hopefully the average British white person has better English comprehension than you do.
when they are used to prop up a stereotype.
Did the DM article say all black people are criminals? I didn't get to read it and cba with searching the dm site. (Because i'm white, lazy and dumb)
when they are used to prop up a stereotype.
Did I say it did?
I did carefully word it to say "we're not doing much better", which implies that unlike educational performance, White British are about average rather than behind the curve, but yeah this was a relatively lazy OP, its GD not SC afterallLots of the others suck as :
So why does some of the OP suck?![]()
Way to spin the figures the way you want them to read and to misrepresent data sets.
Why not post about the part where they admit over the long-term migrants are a net drain?
Why not post about the part where the "native Brits are terrible value for money for the tax payer" actually included a massive amount of writing off debt?
Why not draw some other conclusions that you can from those figures?
Why even try and compare London to Newcastle - London is like a different country in fairness to the rest of the country?
OP's girl friend sucks
Well she sure ain't lazy![]()
Care to explain the context behind the personal attacks here chaps? I don't mind the abuse, but I just don't see where its coming from.fullfacial.jpg
I did carefully word it to say "we're not doing much better", which implies that unlike educational performance, White British are about average rather than behind the curve, but yeah this was a relatively lazy OP, its GD not SC afterall
London Newcastle is compared in the article directly, but I didn't understand why that direct comparison was made either, as you say they're pretty much as different as UK cities can get.
Back to the ficals, from the actual report:
![]()
EU immigration is positive because a large amount of them go back home, and are replaced by newer arrivals, meaning the costs of old age and childcare are not borne by the UK. non-EU immigrants acheive pretty much tax payers parity with the natives, despite having much more children, and thus (it can reasonable be assumed) a higher direct cost.
So I go back to my point in the OP. White British are under acheiving. Why?
Care to explain the context behind the personal attacks here chaps? I don't mind the abuse, but I just don't see where its coming from.
It was meant to provoke debate sure, but smuggness? I'm a white UKIP voter.Sure.
Thread title. You can lie all you want about why you wrote it, but it was deliberately inflammatory and we all know there is a deliberate smugness behind it.
So, if your going to be narrow minded then so are others..
It was meant to provoke debate sure, but smuggness? I'm a white UKIP voter.
Again, where does the BBC article state that ALL white British people are lazy or dumb? It doesn't!
Hopefully the average British white person has better English comprehension than you do.
Did I say it did?
The other thread wasn't deleted because of the DM article. If the DM made that claim they would be prosecuted.
Of course the BBC spins it with "diversity" but what they are realy getting at is exactly what the op has said. The bbc article says that diversity is directly responsible for better performance of white British in london. I would argue the opposite, the influx of mass immigration has led to decline in performance if white british in london because of increase in the amount of languages and the often lower intelligence level of immigrants which brings down the performance of white british. Historically london has always performed better on aggregate than the rest of the country in the way the study has tried to use this long term trend by saying that it is the diversity responsible for it. It is a racist theory. There is no diversity in the rest of the country? It just makes no sense what ever way you look at it.
The study author basically set out to find statistics to agree with his pro mass immigration pro eu opinions.
There is nothing inherently different in the ability of pupils from different ethnic backgrounds, but the children of relatively recent immigrants typically have greater hopes and expectations of education, and are, on average, more likely to be engaged with their school work.