Yes, about 24% of Englanders interpret St.George's Cross as sign of "racism and extremism". 39% do not associate it with national pride when they see one. Some British Future survey published in Telegraph.
I'm disgusted by that

Yes, about 24% of Englanders interpret St.George's Cross as sign of "racism and extremism". 39% do not associate it with national pride when they see one. Some British Future survey published in Telegraph.
I'm disgusted by that. I hate the BNP with a passion. Such a shame as I do feel national pride from the St George's cross and Union jacks. Do Union jacks fall under the same guise?
How did they come to that conclusion ? The people I mean not the survey.
It seems like a heavily biased sample.
I wouldn't put too much weight behind that poll, if it's the one referred to here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-Britons-say-all-immigrants-should-leave.html
I suppose far right wing, EDL and BNP. Pure St. George's Cross is rare in other hands - Church of England use St. George's Cross but it now always contains arms of the diocese in the left-hand upper corner. Among army/navy colours I think civilians and civilian crafts are forbidden from flying St. George's Cross, that privilege belongs only to the Admiral of Royal Navy.
I personally always think of it as trouble. Football "firm" banners or fealty to EDL. I don't understand why people don't display Union Jack or with Union Jack if it's national pride (american style).
Your reasoning being?
(runs to google scared).
Oh, wow. Now that is some poll result! Who on earth is running this think tank, who am I quoting (runs to google scared).
excluding the BNP bit. why ?
I remain hopeful that 25% of the population aren't stupid enough to think "send back all migrants whether they are here legally or not" to be workable or even beneficial.
So your reasoning for it being a heavily biased sample is that you don't believe it? I was hoping you had a little more than that. I didn't see anything out of the ordinary on a cursory glance so I was wondering what I missed.
I'm not sure if I'm honest. The St George cross tied together our history for a good 600 years (iirc) before being superseded by the UK flag. I suppose a lot of it was from my great grandparents and grandparents who used to display it proudly as a symbol of what they fought for in the wars.
Afaik the flag was never designed to represent racism so it seems a shame it's been sullied in that regards.
Still don't understand people wanting to vote UKIP, particularly poor people, those in lowly paid jobs, those who have to survive on benefits, those who rely on the NHS.
Farage is an ex banker and still has all his chums in the City. The main reason he wants to get out of Europe is to avoid the regulation on the finance industry.
Forget immigration, forget the beer swilling to impress us "commoners", look at the latest recruits to UKIP, they are the right wing of the Tory party and there will be more.
question ( not an implication ): When has nationalism ever not been a form of racism ?
even in its most minimal form.
I suppose in certain conditions you can maintain nationalistic attachment to your country/micronation/macronation without being xenophobic or racist.
I would imagine many nationalists, who voted for independence of Scotland, really genuinely wanted to be just free Scotts in free Scotland, without wanting it to be nation of white people or nation without other British nations or foreigners or even exiting EU.
Many nationalist movements in "forgotten" countries, such as Andalusia or Basque Country (very tainted by paramilitary and terrorist actions) don't dive into global xenophobia or share any particular racist agenda other than "we want our country, land for our people" .