It's slightly hypocritical I agree, but what would it say about someone who could afford to send their kids to public/private school but chose to send them to a state school instead because it helped that person further their own career?
It's because she lies about her reasons and changes her views whenever she wants, that is if she will give her view. When asked directly for her views she often refuses yet wants to be voted into office to enforce often unknown views.
It's not about what she did with her kids, but her constant avoiding of the question as to why. She made statements that west indian mothers... without watching it again... go the extra mile I think it was, she pushes that west indian mothers are better, thus the children are better... yet sends her school elsewhere.
She says one thing and does another. If she said private school was better for her child but she'll work to make state schools good enough that her childrens children can go to state school that is fine. But she's out there saying black mothers are better, being generally racist to get the black vote, while actually in her private life PROVING she's a liar and doesn't believe these things.
Most politicians will in fact lie, that is fine, but she does it blatantly, while also being a horrible public speaker, giving horrible interviews, making constantly controversial and at times racist things. She would be a horrible mayor and is a bad politician/mp.