No, no it's not. How is that even remotely the same thing? You can't supersed something with something that currently works on one vendors equipment. Unless you're saying this will sway the overal marketshare way, way in the other direction.
If they were worried about AMD in any respect they wouldn't be dry humping an already clustered mobile market.
They've said they've no plans, so unless that's a devious way of, I don't know, say losing customers, then I would imagine they genuinely-have no plans![]()
Look at it as Adaptive Sync is the technology competition against g-sync rather than Freesync.
Adaptive Sync has support from AMD already and as its an "open" technology from VESA others like Intel could implement it.
So yes its very much the same thing, although Adaptive Sync is later to the game than G-Sync it has a much better possibility of "winning" (i say that as if someone will win a prize)
G-Sync is very limited in market share because :-
- Nvidia Only
- Monitor HW costs more
- Monitor makers need to "buy" G-Sync from nvidia
All of these work to help Adaptive Sync supporters