Shooting at French Satirical Magazine

jfw11z.png

Muhammad/muslim pics in this story on the BBC;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15551998

Guardian also published plenty
 
Indeed, but I think you'll find that a very large percentage of racists are also bigoted in many other areas also (homophobic, sexist, religious bigotry ..etc)
At least they are consistent :rolleyes:

It doesn't necessarily work the other way though... There are very legitimate reasons to dislike/mock a belief...
 
Anyone watching Sky News coverage this morning? They seem to be doing it quite well IMHO.
(Just finished a minutes silence at Place de la République and Notre-Dame)
 
Are you sure about that?

I stand corrected, we launched our first drone strike in November.

That being said I don't have a problem with drone strikes in principal. If we launch strikes against schools or other similar civilian targets I would have an issue. Strikes against ISIS camps of similar I have no problem with.
 
I stand corrected, we launched our first drone strike in November.

That being said I don't have a problem with drone strikes in principal. If we launch strikes against schools or other similar civilian targets I would have an issue. Strikes against ISIS camps of similar I have no problem with.

Pretty sure America uses UK resources too conduct drone operations too.
 
The ultimate irony in my eyes is that this part of the world that we are at such odds with has vast VAST amounts of a resource that the development of our society has become largely dependent - oil

2qs3vxl.jpg

Indeed. When someone has something you need to survive, you get hold of it however you can (usually by means of most reward for least effort).

If the place you get it from suddenly closes their doors, you have to re-think your strategy.

There are, of course, many ways to go. Direct action is one. Manipulation and subversion is another.

The irony is that the west may well be buying their oil from places occupied by ISIL and perpetuating their advances at the same time as condemning them as terrorists that need to be stopped. Politics at it's best!

Politicians with fountain pens are well known for playing war games in that way.
 
What the minutes silence where the sky reporter wouldn't shut the hell up???
Yeah, very respectful :rolleyes:

I agree, some of Sky's reporting has been really disrespectful.

One one reporter almost had is feet in the blood of the dead police officer whilst describing how he was "finished off"
 
This feels a little like it's going in circles...

The majority should not be condemned by the actions of individuals just because you happen to believe that their ONLY motivation is religious and because you happen to believe that the entire Muslim community condones the attacks because you, personally, are not happy with the community's response to the acts.

As long as it's still feasible that their refusal to apologise on behalf of a few extremists is because people like you will continue to lump them all in the same boat, then we should give them the benefit of the doubt surely?

Only because you keep comparing Apples to Oranges.

No-one is being asked to apologise, only to publicly condemn their fellow Muslims for carrying out terror attacks in the name of their faith.

Until they do so, they will be treated with suspicion and rightly so as this is the community that sheltered and possibly those responsible for terrorist acts on British soil.

This guy isn't helping either:

https://twitter.com/anjemchoudary
 
I have made a simple guide up to help explain the differences between Radical and Moderate Muslims:

Radical Muslims just want to behead every Westerner and unbeliever and then enforce their way of life on everyone.

Moderate Muslims just want Radical Muslims to behead every Westerner and unbeliever and then enforce their way of life on everyone.

How stupid are you :confused:
 
I stand corrected, we launched our first drone strike in November.

That being said I don't have a problem with drone strikes in principal. If we launch strikes against schools or other similar civilian targets I would have an issue. Strikes against ISIS camps of similar I have no problem with.

Thousands and thousands of totally innocent women and children have been killed by drone strikes, whether they were targeted or collateral damage is utterly irrelevant to the friends and family of the dead!

If someone killed or wiped out my family I too would then become a 'terrorist' in their eyes as I would want revenge !!!
 
Back
Top Bottom