Wrong straight away, but maybe I'm being picky.
Shooting at French Satirical Magazine
- Thread starter Westyfield2
- Start date
Wrong straight away, but maybe I'm being picky.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 13,052
- Location
- london
YES i am anti-islamic (i am against all religions) and i didn't need a mass murder of French cartoonists to convince me of that.
Lemonade has taken the usual religious response to religious violence and that is too claim that they are not interpreting the same book correctly. As i have explained this is giving religion a free pass. He then went on to try and justify the murder of cartoonist by pointing out that americans have killed people in a completely different country with drones.
Removed
Another personal attack like that and you will be suspended. I appreciate that people's blood is up but there's no need for that - Rilot
Except we don't have the Taliban running around in our back yards
But yea its all the wests fault right?
This video strikes a chord at the moment seeing as he mentions the cartoons.
Yeh exactly the Taliban are not in our back yards attacking us, so why the hell are we in their lands attacking them?
Who said ak47? Glock or Beretta would be enough... I hate COD BTW.Im sorry but ?? LOL what the actual hell ?? Arm every citizen with an AK47
Too much COD: Go to bed !
Luton lol.
Well....
Eh? Since when did terrorists care about complying with the Geneva Convention?
So you'd have civilians firing pistols across the street from elevated positions at terrorists equipped with body armour and assault rifles?
If you think arming civilians is the solution to tackling terrorist attacks, you're completely deluded.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 9,952
You must have a short memory.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2012
- Posts
- 657
You cannot reason or negotiate with Islamic extremists who want the destruction of western civilization.
Oh no they weren't.
They were giving a legitimate reason for why people maybe perpetrate these attacks.
Basically giving the other side of the coin.
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 384
- Location
- Manchester
Well technically he is right as it wasn't 'the taliban', but I get your point.
Oh don't get me wrong, I agree with anyones right to spout whatever crap they want too. I was just higlighting his hypocrisy for wanting to censor groups of people that he doesn't agree with..
Please tell me exactly what is disgusting and exactly what is wrong with what they are saying?
Then your opinion, as so often, is pretty disgusting.
I find it insulting how you value european lives over the lives of non europeans.
I also find it insulting that you can't read or comprehend discussions, my specific post was actually related to a sub discussion on drones that was taking place and not on the french killings.
Jesus Christ,
God help us.I stand for Jesus of Nazareth.
Whether I would have the conviction of faith to say it with an FBI (****'ing big indian) in my face, only God knows. The Bible says in the end times many will die for our faith.
Last edited:
Nope, like a lot of people here he doesn't have a clue what his talking about!
The racist reference about the magazine is actually to do with some of the vile racist cartoons they used to publish, and i'm not specifically talking about Muslims related. I doubt most hear ever heard of this magazine before yesterdays event let alone know the history of the magazines publications.
That's quite frankly laughable considering that chain of comments was related to him agreeing with a statement saying we should not go out and start attacking Muslims because of this shooting...
Then again, from previous threads it doesn't appear like you (and several others in this thread) can differentiate between people that aren't anti Muslim and people that are pro this kind of attack.
It's a "you're either with us or against us" mentality, which coincidentally is very similar to the Islamic extremists.
