Shooting at French Satirical Magazine

[IC3]

Nope, like a lot of people here he doesn't have a clue what his talking about!

I must have confused him with someone else than, but I swear he got beat up pretty badly.

 

[lemonade]

Did you see me in the Anders Behring Breivik thread going about cultural marxism and immigration? NO.

Religious think they have a monopoly on the truth and this gives them a type of arrogance that is unprecedented, they actually think that people need to listen to what they have to say and what they say is some how correct in of itself.

What can i say? religion is evil, it is wrong, it is stupid, it is violent, it is silly, it is nothing positive.

Perhaps if you and others didnt constantly bring up the topic of religion in this thread there wouldn't be others counter arguing about the same topic.

You sound more angry than an angry mob of religionists.

 

[jmc007]

Edited my previous post accordingly.

 

[C.R.A.Z.Y]

I must have confused him with someone else than, but I swear he got beat up pretty badly.

He did get a beating but his alive and still spewing his ignorant hatred

 

[Amp34]

Perhaps if you and others didnt constantly bring up the topic of religion in this thread there wouldn't be others counter arguing about the same topic.

You sound more angry than an angry mob of religionists.

The extremist anti-Muslims have a lot more in common with the extremist Muslims than they like to admit.

 

[lemonade]

In USA people have guns, so why can't we have them in Europe?! The rifle would be very expensive to buy anyway, so not that many people could actually afford it and I don't think many would get permission to own a gun anyway.

I'm just wondering when this sort of thing will happen in UK, terrorists shooting policemen in the middle of the day...

Yes because guns would solve everything, I'm sure a few mass school shootings can be overlooked and gangland rifle shootouts in middle of oxford street would be fine too.

and of course no one would buy a gun without a license would they.

 

[TheBDog]

Nope, like a lot of people here he doesn't have a clue what his talking about!

As far as I can tell he's definitely not dead!

Though according to Wikipedia he did step down following lots of interactions with the think tank Quilliam, that is trying to help against extremism.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quilliam_(think_tank))

He's even quoted as saying(regarding Quilliam):

I didn’t think a Muslim would confront Mo Ansar because I thought Mo Ansar was being built as the acceptable face of Islam; and that’s everything that I think is wrong. So when I saw this [debate between Nawaz and Ansar], and I read more about Quilliam and I looked at what Quilliam has done – they've actually brought change, which is what I want to do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_(activist)
His Wiki page highlights both that

1. Even he decided that he was wrong on some of his views of Islam and

2. That it's pretty clear that not every Muslim thinks the same way...

 

[Danthus]

Perhaps if you and others didnt constantly bring up the topic of religion in this thread there wouldn't be others counter arguing about the same topic.

You sound more angry than an angry mob of religionists.

Why would you not bring up religion in this thread?

 

[Westyfield2]

Turns out that the reports of a gunman up at La Defense this morning were false.

 

["andy"]

I find this extremely insulting to be honest. You come in a thread about muslims killing cartoonist to try and justify and rationalize their behaviour? You should be ashamed of yourself.

he is not trying to justify their behavior. he is just pointing out that this isnt all as 'one sided' as our media makes it out to be


the strange thing is that our media being so one sided is exactly what terrorist groups want when the commit acts like this one.

http://www.juancole.com/2015/01/sharpening-contradictions-satirists.html

 

[lemonade]

No, his posts are defending and promoting violence though.

Lol, show me where I have done such.

I think you'll find that your fence of the side have been promoting nuking certain groups of people and putting a final solution to them.

 

[Haggisman]

In USA people have guns, so why can't we have them in Europe?!

I think this is a good reason why not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

 

[IC3]

He did get a beating but his alive and still spewing his ignorant hatred

He's not too birght and this video just confirms that
But if muslims/islam or whatever/whoever comes to live in europe should not enforce their laws on someone else's homeland...

 

[Yaayuh!]

--

 

[TheBDog]

Tommy Robinson stepped down from the EDL in 2013...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_(activist)

 

[Freefaller]

I think this is a good reason why not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

Indeed - and if you filter by homicide the UK is down in the bottom 8.

 

[lemonade]

YES i am anti-islamic (i am against all religions) and i didn't need a mass murder of French cartoonists to convince me of that.

Lemonade has taken the usual religious response to religious violence and that is too claim that they are not interpreting the same book correctly. As i have explained this is giving religion a free pass. He then went on to try and justify the murder of cartoonist by pointing out that americans have killed people in a completely different country with drones.

Removed

Another personal attack like that and you will be suspended. I appreciate that people's blood is up but there's no need for that - Rilot

You must seriously have some serious reading and comprehension issues. I probably made like one post in relation to interpretations yesterday afternoon and as said before the drones post was in relation to a mini sub discussion about drones. Not gonna explain myself again as I don't need to, especially to an ignoramus.

 

[Above&Beyond]

That info is so irrelevant, does it gloss over the fact that drones have killed thousands of civilians? Here is just one example

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...9cbe78-3a81-11e3-b7ba-503fb5822c3e_story.html

Drones do absolutely FA, they have infact created a new generation of so called terrorists (really they are people angry with their families being killed and their way of life being under attacked). SWAT valley as an example was just a normal tribal area, then america and her allies which includes the pakistani army which it forcefully made it join decided to bomb it to smithereens which made the people take up arms and resort to eye for an eye style retaliation which severe consequences.

This is Nabila Rehman

Her mother and her grandmother died in a drone strike, she just about survived it along with other family members. All of this happened when they were picking vegetables in their garden. Bet you have never heard of her or her case, nor would you care this its just a brown face and a muslim from some backward uncivilised part of the world.

If we had drones being flown by some foreign nation and killing off people here in the UK that it deemed undesirable, you would be outraged.

Muslims were killing each other over petty squabbles in the Swat valley before her great-great-grandfather was alive. If these villages hide militants then expect to be hit with missiles.

 

[spudbynight]

What are they going to protest against?

"Not in my name" springs to mind.

 

[TheBDog]

Muslims were killing each other over petty squabbles in the Swat valley before her great-great-grandfather was alive. If these villages hide militants then expect to be hit with missiles.

You didn't address that last point so I will reiterate it for effect(because I agree with lemonade here):

If we had drones being flown by some foreign nation and killing off people here in the UK that it deemed undesirable, you would be outraged.