Shooting at French Satirical Magazine

Nobody is doing that anyway so I am not sure what your point is.

The point being you are ok to go ahead with the freedom to insult when you know its not your family that are likely to be killed but would you have the same stance if it was your family likely to be targeted by your actions.
 
The point being you are ok to go ahead with the freedom to insult when you know its not your family that are likely to be killed but would you have the same stance if it was your family likely to be targeted by your actions.

No, hanging a huge cartoon of Muhammad on the front of my house is not the same as a newspaper on display amongst other newspapers.
 
So would any of you guys make a massive drawing of Mohammed and hang it across your house putting yourselves and family at risk of attack ?

Or alternatively, would you purposely repeatedly insult millions of people?

If I walked down the high street swearing and insulting people I would expect consequences. It may be my freedom iof speech to insult people, but I could also be charged with abuse.


This doesn't make any of the consequences right. I just think it is plain rude to continuously insult people, however ridicuous I find their opinions.
 
Or alternatively, would you purposely repeatedly insult millions of people?

If I walked down the high street swearing and insulting people I would expect consequences. It may be my freedom iof speech to insult people, but I could also be charged with abuse.


This doesn't make any of the consequences right. I just think it is plain rude to continuously insult people, however ridicuous I find their opinions.

Quite...we have been hearing an awful lot about Liberté recently....not so much about Fraternité.
 
Or alternatively, would you purposely repeatedly insult millions of people?

If I walked down the high street swearing and insulting people I would expect consequences. It may be my freedom iof speech to insult people, but I could also be charged with abuse.


This doesn't make any of the consequences right. I just think it is plain rude to continuously insult people, however ridicuous I find their opinions.


its a magazine with a tiny circulation

it is more like you said something amongst your friends, someone else heard about it, beat the crap out of you for it, others were outraged by that action and now everyone is waiting for your reaction and everyone wants to know if you're now going to cower away or stick to your view point
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/lliana-bird/charlie-hebdo_b_6461030.html

As long time reader and Frenchman, Olivier Tonneau pointed out in his excellent article, The National Front and the Le Pen family were in fact their primary targets above all others. Next came bosses, politicians and the corrupt. Finally they opposed organised religion. ALL organised religion. They didn't hate or abuse or target any one group or religion. They did however mock ALL systems and organisations and individuals of power - from political to religious to everything in between. They were satirists, and all people, systems and organisations should be open to criticism and mockery (so long as it sticks within the laws of the land). They were democratic in their ridicule and satirisation. No one was exempt. To do otherwise would have been the hypocritical. Equal rights also means equal treatment.

why is this so hard for people to understand - why do people believe one group should get special treatment/immunity from satire/criticism because they'll be ultra offended and potentially act violently?

I doubt any of the critics would be fussed by people mocking political figures - but add in a 'god' and a sensitive potentially following and suddenly special status should be given?
 
BBC News this morning interviewed some French Muslims who were condemning the release of the Mohammed cartoon today, at the same time they were doing the Islamic State sign...
 
Back
Top Bottom