Shooting at French Satirical Magazine

Tefal · 14 Jan 2015 at 11:35

when did the french murder hundreds of thousands of Algerians?

Johno please? · 14 Jan 2015 at 11:36

DAIR said:
If I poke / tease a black tiger snake do I deserve to be bitten/poisoned?

AAAAAAAAhhahahaha theres always a crap analogy in these arguments, but my word, you are the winner, amazing.

Tefal · 14 Jan 2015 at 11:38

zoomee said:
http://stopwar.org.uk/news/charlie-...ils-and-the-limits-of-the-free-speech-crusade

also funny how you cite a man who's colleagues were involved in anti Semitic assaults.

how ever did you come across him i wonder

Will21st · 14 Jan 2015 at 11:44

Tefal said:
also funny how you cite a man who's colleagues were involved in anti Semitic assaults.

how ever did you come across him i wonder

well we all know how much zoomee loves jews, so...

DAIR · 14 Jan 2015 at 11:45

Metallifux said:
Comparing wild animals and radical muslims. Interesting.

Watch this space!

DAIR · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:06

Will21st said:
and still you're blaming the victims. You're justifying the attacks, no more, no less.

Wow... I'm not blaming any of those victims killed in the store. I do not condone what happened one bit.

I'm simply saying we need to seriously think before speak/create controversial images.

Above&Beyond · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:10

DAIR said:
Wow... I'm not blaming any of those victims killed in the store. I do not condone what happened one bit.

I'm simply saying we need to seriously think before speak/create controversial images.

Letting these ignorant terrorist psychopaths dictate what we do isn't going to happen. If they could stop killing people for drawing pictures then that would be a great start.

Will21st · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:15

DAIR said:
Wow... I'm not blaming any of those victims killed in the store. I do not condone what happened one bit.

DAIR said:
I'm simply saying we need to seriously think before speak/create controversial images.

wow indeed... if say a Newspaper had written an article on Islam, saying Islam is a horrible religion and Mohammed was a fraud, and those terrorists would've killed all these people for that, would you still argue along the same lines?

Where does it end? Quite incredible that you can't see how you're excusing their actions.

Skunkworks · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:18

It's lucky DAIR's not running the country, else we'd all be living under sharia.

DAIR · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:18

How have I excused their actions?

The fact of the matter is that people like them are a threat. Simple as. I want want to be slaughtered because a group a people found an image insulting.

Will21st · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:23

DAIR said:
How have I excused their actions?

The fact of the matter is that people like them are a threat. Simple as. I want want to be slaughtered because a group a people found an image insulting.

so you'd rather cave in to the demands of the nutters and give up on our hard-fought values and rights? No thanks.

scorza · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:24

DAIR said:
Wow... I'm not blaming any of those victims killed in the store. I do not condone what happened one bit.

I'm simply saying we need to seriously think before speak/create controversial images.

FWIW I agree with that, and if there had been protests and letter writing campaigns then maybe laws on free speech could have been modified to include restrictions on gross insults to religions. However to do that now, in response to a violent massacre in an act of appeasement would be counterproductive. We cannot afford to look weak on this.

Above&Beyond · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:25

DAIR said:
How have I excused their actions?

The fact of the matter is that people like them are a threat. Simple as. I want want to be slaughtered because a group a people found an image insulting.

No way should we appease them. **** that noise.

darreny · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:46

Will21st said:
so you'd rather cave in to the demands of the nutters and give up on our hard-fought values and rights? No thanks.

What are their demands?

The fact is if the picture was never published they would have had no reason to attack Charlie heb, had they still done so the we would have every justification to call them terrorists.

We have to be careful we don't end up with a situation that could cause a far bigger conflict

DAIR · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:49

Above&Beyond said:
No way should we appease them. **** that noise.

lol

You sound like you're just about ready for all out war.

Metallifux · 14 Jan 2015 at 12:52

darreny said:
What are their demands?

The fact is if the picture was never published they would have had no reason to attack Charlie heb, had they still done so the we would have every justification to call them terrorists.

We have to be careful we don't end up with a situation that could cause a far bigger conflict

Are you saying that we have no justification for calling terrorists, affiliated with a terrorist group terrorists? That's a lot of terror I know. You are right though they probably wouldn't have attacked Charlie Hebdo, they would have bombed the Paris underground or something similar instead.

Above&Beyond · 14 Jan 2015 at 13:09

DAIR said:
lol

You sound like you're just about ready for all out war.

This is a war already. These barbarians aren't going to win or build their caliphate on the rubble of western civilization.

IvanDobskey · 14 Jan 2015 at 13:11

That Charlie ebdo magazine is now selling millions. Nobody had ever heard of it before the terrorist attack. So tell me exactly what have they achieved? Stupid as well as evil.

Demon · 14 Jan 2015 at 13:13

IvanDobskey said:
That Charlie ebdo magazine is now selling millions. Nobody had ever heard of it before the terrorist attack. So tell me exactly what have they achieved? Stupid as well as evil.

Who is stupid, and who is evil?

I sense you have a point, could you be more specific?

Tone1979 · 14 Jan 2015 at 13:18

so err...yeah..

If you want a copy of the Charlie Hebdo which came out a couple of days ago, it will cost upwards of £550 on ebay.

faith in humanity, gone.