Understandable, im the same but nvidia are always to overpriced (TITAN LOL) while offering a small bump of performance over amd, and i still won't mind seeing them get little slap for what they be doing.
Yer, those Titans were a rip off alright

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Understandable, im the same but nvidia are always to overpriced (TITAN LOL) while offering a small bump of performance over amd, and i still won't mind seeing them get little slap for what they be doing.
I ain't no fan boy as i have owned nvidia and amd, but im kinda looking forward to amd slapping nvidia.
Just sayin
Nooo this is a total snooze fest. Nvidia launched the 980 5% better than GTX 780 Ti, all AMD have to do is tidy up the 290X (2013) to beat it..
Couldn't get more boring, GM200 / 390X will be the only cards really worthwhile and GM200 will likely cost up to £1000..
This is the worst the GPU space has ever been. Lack of progression, no node change..
Basically we've got another year of milking until truly 'new' cards appear. The midrange will be old rehashed cards again like we saw with 7970 > 280X / GTX 680 > GTX 770..
Nobody should be congratulating AMD / Nvidia imhoExcept their financial departments of course..
Understandable, im the same but nvidia are always to overpriced (TITAN LOL) while offering a small bump of performance over amd, and i still won't mind seeing them get little slap for what they be doing.
and then when you look at their source it clearly saysTonga physically features 2,048 stream processors based on the more advanced GCN 1.3 architecture,
Radeon R9 370 & 370x Tonga Performance GCN 1.2, 2048 shader units @ 256 bit GDDR5 DDR interface 2/4 GB of GDDR5 memory mglw. End of Q2 / 2015 (Own speculation)
I run a pair of Titans and they've turned out great value for longevity due to their spec.
VRAM isn't everything though. It's funny, I've never seen so many people talking about VRAM since the 970 mess, and all of a sudden it's like the only thing that matters with a GPU lol! I have a 670 4GB... more usable VRAM than a 970... can it compete... no, obviously! The Titan is hardly a 670 I know, but they are still running VERY expensive second-hand. Somewhat unjustifiably so IMO. Would be a strange choice for anyone but a pure enthusiast who just wants one for the sake of it.People laughed at Titan/Titan black buyers but they sure got the last laugh.
In a few days the Titan will be two years old, and it still offers performance almost on par with the 970/290X plus 50% more VRAM than either. The Titan Black will be a year old in a few days and is still quicker than any single GPU except the 980 (which it again has 50% more RAM than).
VRAM isn't everything though. It's funny, I've never seen so many people talking about VRAM since the 970 mess, and all of a sudden it's like the only thing that matters with a GPU lol! I have a 670 4GB... more usable VRAM than a 970... can it compete... no, obviously! The Titan is hardly a 670 I know, but they are still running VERY expensive second-hand. Somewhat unjustifiably so IMO. Would be a strange choice for anyone but a pure enthusiast who just wants one for the sake of it.
I agree they aren't slouches, but at the price they're still fetching it seems a bit mad given the 980 will outperform it in most games, runs cooler and draws less power.You need to see the Titans in action as there is a bit more going on than just a bit more VRAM, the Titans are very smooth and put later cards to shame.
You do realise this goes both ways right?People laughed at Titan/Titan black buyers but they sure got the last laugh.
In a few days the Titan will be two years old, and it still offers performance almost on par with the 970/290X plus 50% more VRAM than either. The Titan Black will be a year old in a few days and is still quicker than any single GPU except the 980 (which it again has 50% more RAM than).
I agree they aren't slouches, but at the price they're still fetching it seems a bit mad given the 980 will outperform it in most games, runs cooler and draws less power.
I agree they aren't slouches, but at the price they're still fetching it seems a bit mad given the 980 will outperform it in most games, runs cooler and draws less power.
Yes, and it's the SAME reason why the 970/980 have a 256-bit memory interface. Watch when their next cards have probably double that and blow the previous gen away... it's all about money at the end of the day. Everything they do is based around a very tight and well thought out cost/performance/life cycle ratio, never taking their eye of the next 2-3 products further down the line, so as to ensure that whatever does come next is a significant enough jump to repeat the cycle all over again. All rather clever actually, but it's not the consumer who wins in the long run... their bottom line does!You do realise this goes both ways right?
If it shows anything it shows Nvidia have done so little for improving the performance of the mainstream, and delibrately disapproving AIB partners to put same amount of vram as the Titan, till the product close to becoming EOL (and even that it is with little availability i.e. the 780 6GB).
Had 6GB version of the 780 been available around 1-2 months after the launch of the 780 3GB, then the Titan wouldn't have looks that great an investment at all. Somehow I think Nvidia's decision limit the 780's memory to 3GB is to artificially make the Titan look more appealing and more of an premium product than it really is.
I have both and for 4K gaming I would use the Titans every time.![]()
Nothing Nvidia has beats the 290 series, God powered cards.