Tbh if it's a choice between winning dirty or losing while playing nicely by the rules, then I choose winning.
ISIS and Islamic militants - discussion
- Thread starter robfosters
- Start date
Tbh if it's a choice between winning dirty or losing while playing nicely by the rules, then I choose winning.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,654
- Location
- La France
Good enough for the Romans = good enough for us.
As above, you're no better than IS then. They like to play dirty too.
IS probably brainwash their recruits by showing them videos the West bombing innocents. The same way you seem to have been sucked from the other side.
Then America and the UK are already as bad as them.
Good enough for the terrorists.
I am not entirely sure if the choice has come down to that yet nor if it ever will.
So you want to kill lots of innocent people?
*Potential terrorists
That is the stupidest place for Jews to be living anyway, they are bound to get attacked one day.
They should all come to the UK, we'll build a wall around the lost city of London and they can live next door, make them feel right at home.
Then turn the ME to glass, achieve world peace in a day, anyone shedding a tear is probably a liberal anyway.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,654
- Location
- La France
Fine by me as I like a level playing field.
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/an-idiot-made-a-game-called-muhammad-sex-simulator
I know I shouldn't laugh really, but the idiot jihadis have brought this on themselves
Muhammad is making BACON in the video
We did it in WW2
Hardly the same situation.
I don't give a crap as long as I don't have to live under the hell of Sharia law.
We did it in WW2
Eugh
Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,576
- Location
- Warwickshire
From their point of view, the West are the barbaric terrorists, we just do it with weaponry that allows us to be distant from the kill, rather than up close and personal with a knife.
This is the major issue.
Everyone involved believes they are the ones in the right.
Which it isn't. Next thinly masked bigoted statement please.
could you offer your opinion as to what it is?
This isn't a two horse race. There are plenty of options to be taken from doing absolutely nothing up to and including starting an apocalypse inducing war, and anything in between. To use a metaphor: this is an analog spectrum, not a digital "all or nothing."
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2009
- Posts
- 3,310
- Location
- In west London
Just going to post this and await the **** storm.
The race was lost years ago - they move into an area, all the white people move out, the imans tell people to elect islamist councillors and school governors, the area becomes a no go area for police and social workers.
Repeat.
What is happening in sand land is irrelevant until they start bombing Israel, which is inevitable.
Repeat.
What is happening in sand land is irrelevant until they start bombing Israel, which is inevitable.