Do you not read?
Something about a horse and the stable door.
You are saying these Muslim authorities will be 'questioning themselves' based on nothing at all. Who decides who is a 'proper' Muslim anyway and has the authority to tell you what you are doing is right or wrong?
Care to explain the numerous depictions of the geezer that were created by many venerated Islamic artists in the past?
Its not based on nothing, partly its based on my professional opinon, partly on the actions of said groups and partly on the increased condemnation from areas that had previously remained silent. Even actions such as Jordan and Egyptian military actions in response to these atrocities are relatively new, showing a turning point in the way Muslim authorities are reacting to extremism.
And part of the problem is that there is no clericalism in Islam as such, so it makes it increasingly difficult to point at a specific area and say "sort that out" so they rely on organisations such as Al Ahzar, Imams, Prominent Scholars, Patriarchs and so on to counter ideologies such as those spread by Islamist organisations such as The Muslim Brotherhood.
Profesional opinion?
Omar el-Hussein, the 22-year-old Danish man shot dead by police after supposedly carrying out the worst attack on Danish soil for decades, was a petty criminal with a past seemingly full of contradictions. He was a smart student but reportedly had a short fuse and was prone to violence. He was a talented kickboxer and yet appeared to have suffered from anxiety and used cannabis.
Believed to have been born in Copenhagen to Palestinian parents who left a refugee camp in Jordan to come to Denmark, he spoke fluent Danish and Arabic and, local media reported, was always quick to debate the Palestinian issue.
Hussein has been widely named by local media as the Copenhagen gunman. Danish intelligence services have suggested the fatal Copenhagen shooting of a film-maker at a freedom-of-speech debate and a Jewish security guard at a synagogue may have been a copycat of last month’s Paris attacks on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a kosher supermarket. If that was the case, Hussein would have had to have followed those Paris attacks from a Danish prison, where he was serving a two-year sentence for stabbing a 19-year-old man on Copenhagen’s inner-city train system. He had been released from prison only two weeks before the attacks in Copenhagen at the weekend.
Shock, horror as man who kills people was just released from prison after stabbing someone...
Http://gu.com/p/45pad
And shock horror again, he was known to intelligence services after they were alerted by someone that noticed changes in him in prison. Why are we mass collecting data again?
Increasingly it sounds as if this kid fits the last characterisation in Majnu's cartoon in another thread and had some serious emotional and social issues. Someone who has fallen through the system and not some hardened Islamic terrorist after all.
The fact that he was actually highlighted as a potential threat suggests that the system of collecting data works. Unfortunately, the ability to act on that information and protect innocents was lost. Why, is anybodys guess.
Increasingly it sounds as if this kid fits the last characterisation in Majnu's cartoon in another thread and had some serious emotional and social issues. Someone who has fallen through the system and not some hardened Islamic terrorist after all.
Unfortunately that doesn't fit the narrative of many with large chips on their shoulder. It can't be "our" fault surely!?
He swore allegiance to ISIS on his facebook and said: 'Our purpose is to destroy you. We will come to you with slaughter and death'
He was radicalized in prison and murdered two people in cold blood for his warped beliefs. I'd say he fit the definition of an Islamic terrorist pretty well.