Protect and Serve . . . yeah right !
- Thread starter Sliver
- Start date
Source for him having mental heath?
See how easy it is to do
Wow I've never seen someone argue so poorly as this.
Have you even looked at the article?
Just highlight the said bit again.
Are the "witnesses" the guys doctor?
"said" to have etc.
Not fact.
Still see how easy it is to do this "source for that" rubbish.
No, I am sorry I provided you with a source.
Here it is;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31702214, accessed 03/03/2015.
You have fundamentally misunderstood what a source is
.
Seeing how Stulid avoided my question earlier it seems quite funny that his is being asked
With Stulids thinking, if you were drunk and drunkenly made a grab for a police officers gun, that officer (or nearby officers) are entitled to shoot you. Which is the question I asked of him.
Believe it or not if I made a move for an armed police officers gun, drunk or not, I wouldn't be at all surprised if i was shot dead.
I'm drunk. Once I get said gun who knows what I might do??
It's still a tragedy and a waste of life.
These officers make snap calls under pressure. Maybe sometimes they get it wrong. This will be investigated an outcome will be made.
I repeat, its tragic. But people calling the officers involved murderers? C'mon..
You're correct, that isn't why I labelled it pretentious though.
Re the rest, yes I added my two pence worth. Got carried away; but we get on of these every other week. People see a video snapshot and start branding police murderers. You even saw it with the Michael Brown case (might not have been a video for that but the officer was still vilified)
Homeless man apparently had mental health issues. Were the police to know that prior to arriving and shooting him? Or did this come out after? They shot him because at that precise moment in time someone judged him to be an immediate threat to the public or themselves.
Being a police officer in America is pretty dangerous, due to it's backward nature with regard to its gun laws.
I would like to think those officers could and would react without shooting you balky.
This is tragic, the officers 'dealt' with this situation wrong. There was no need for this man to lose his life.
No, I am sorry I provided you with a source.
Here it is;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31702214, accessed 03/03/2015.
You have fundamentally misunderstood what a source is
I asked for a source and you only just posted it
But again, its all speculation that he has mental heath issues, nothing confirmed.
This is a homeless man on 'skid row' in L.A.
. I fail to understand how the officers would not expect there to be an increased chance of this man suffering from mental health problems."said" to have etc.
Not fact.
Still see how easy it is to do this "source for that" rubbish.
I asked for a source and you only just posted it
But again, its all speculation that he has mental heath issues, nothing confirmed.
Err, no. I posted the source (link) several post prior. So have you now understood what a source is?
I would hope so to. It would be a drunken mistake by me and I would rather not die. But they have a split second to assess the situation and make a call. It's well within their power to shoot me, and I could be a potential threat if i get my hand on that gun.
I just feel that going round and labelling police murderers is just wrong. They put their lives on the line (arguably even more so than UK police). This will go to review and an outcome will be reached. If they handled it wrongly then they will be punished.
You said he had mental heath issues.
Aggressive, homeless man with mental health issues is forced to the ground by four police officers and executed in the middle of the day, and according to you was 'dealt with'.
And I asked for a source proving this which you still haven't done as all he articles are just speculation and assumption as he was on skid row.
from the BBC article (your "source")
Many is not 100% all.
Ahh, you are one of those people who are like "It's ok, they are just doing their job"
You need to wake up and pull your head out your ass, seriously.
This is a homeless man on 'skid row' in L.A.
I'm honestly not sure the thought process really works like that on the job, maybe it should?
Even if they did think he might have an increased chance, they still didn't know catagorically that this man had mental issues.
They won't though will they, I bet nothing comes of this at all.
I asked for a source and you only just posted it
But again, its all speculation that he has mental heath issues, nothing confirmed.
That isn't what source means.
Seriously, some mega effort has to go in to arguing so poorly.
No. No. No.
According to my source, the unarmed victim suffered from mental health problems.
I have provided you with the source for my information
.I'm not sure you're sure what a the word source means.
Maybe not. You are probably right. But then this is a problem with the judical review process.
No. No. No.
According to my source, the unarmed victim suffered from mental health problems.
I have provided you with the source for my information
I'm not sure you're sure what a the word source means.
Its all speculation still that he had mental heath issues. Nothing concrete or proven which is the important part.
Could have been of sound body and mind but just homeless.