Airbus A320 Crashes in Alps

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:41

Almost to Australia.

What a stupid meaningless factually incorrect pathetic statement that means absolutely nothing. I expected much more from you especially as you seem to like to pick holes in other peoples comments

If you dig a hole from Great Britain you'll end up south east of New zealand.

So looks like both of us have failed

Nitefly · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:43

Xordium said:
Well as I've pointed out the actual risk to passengers of getting killed whilst in the air by suicidal pilots is nil.

*double-takes on thread title*

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:43

Dj_Jestar said:
You think that proves that you are at more risk of a suicidal pilot than a terrorist attack, do you?

Can you not read.

Where did I say terrorist attack?

Glaucus · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:43

Now you can't even distinguish between types of statements,

Fact =/ silly comment.

Werewolf · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:44

VoG said:
Ahhhh the Gimli Glider, you have a good memory, & it's the perfect example of why no matter how sophisticated the software solution is, it cannot trump the hands on approach of an experienced, knowledgeable, human pilot.

There will allways be that unthinkable scenario that makes an experienced pilot sweat, but completely stumps a computer.

Aye, I couldn't remember the name but remembered reading about it (in a Readers Digest amongst other places), and it was on Air Crash Investigators

Another thought that occurs to me is that even in modern aircraft there are often situations that require human muscle power to initiate certain emergency systems, or deal with certain situations.
For example a smoke detector and breaker monitoring might be able to pick up on a fault in a bunch of wiring, but a human might be able to work out if the wiring is the fault, or just a sympton and further action is needed (is the wiring overheating because of a short/too much current draw, or is it because there is a fire next to it).

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:45

Dj_Jestar said:
You think that proves that you are at more risk of a suicidal pilot than a terrorist pilot, do you?

p.s. the hijacking list is bigger than the suicidal list.

Are you really that desperate to try and get one over on someone that you've forgotten how to read.

We are talking about deaths.

So trot off and go count them

Dj_Jestar · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:45

mattyg said:
Can you not read.

Where did I say terrorist attack?

You certainly can't write. Questions end with a question mark, not a full stop.

Back to the subject, I have edited. Your point is still claptrap.

Dj_Jestar · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:46

mattyg said:
Are you really that desperate to try and get one over on someone that you've forgotten how to read.

We are talking about deaths.

So trot off and go count them

No, you were talking about risk. Higher number of incidents == higher risk. You need to trot off.

p.s. 2,997 were killed by terrorist hijacking in 2001. That number is a lot larger than the number on the wiki page for suicidal pilots page. Please learn to read.

Nitefly · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:47

Higher risk of death?

*runs away*

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:49

Dj_Jestar said:
No, you were talking about risk. Higher number of incidents == higher risk. You need to trot off.

More at risk of being killed. Again you failed because your so desperate to get one over

Your being pathetic now.

And I apologise for the sometimes lack of proper punctuation its something us dyslexics can have issues with

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:50

Dj_Jestar said:
No, you were talking about risk. Higher number of incidents == higher risk. You need to trot off.

p.s. 2,997 were killed by terrorist hijacking in 2001. That number is a lot larger than the number on the wiki page for suicidal pilots page. Please learn to read.

Not after sept 10th.

Glaucus · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:51

What happened to 1999

Dj_Jestar · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:54

Then why did you bring Egyptair into it when that happened in 1999?

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:56

mattyg said:
Are you really going to take it upon yourself to point out EVERY meaningless post on this forum..

Your gonna be busy.

Maybe I should have wrote. At this point in time the risk of being killed by a suicidal pilot is greater than being killed by a terrorist pilot

Dj_Jestar said:
[Citation Needed]

mattyg said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_pilot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings

Glaucus said:
And you fail again.

Glaucus said:
What happened to 1999

As you can see from the quotes we've moved on from that now to after 9/11 after you so graciously pointed out that we can't compare pre 9/11 to post 9/11 but that still isn't good enough.

Glaucus · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:57

And as I said that makes any comparison even worse.

Everyone knows what you were trying to imply with the stupid statement, just admit it.

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:57

Dj_Jestar said:
Then why did you bring Egyptair into it when that happened in 1999?

Are you now suffering form memory loss too.

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 00:58

Glaucus said:
And as I said that makes any comparison even worse.

So you can't compare pre to post and now you can't compare post to post.

Wow what can you compare?

Glaucus · 28 Mar 2015 at 01:00

All depends what you are trying to imply, that determines what you need to compare.

Nothing you've posted so far supports your implied position.

mattyg · 28 Mar 2015 at 01:00

Glaucus said:
And as I said that makes any comparison even worse.

Everyone knows what you were trying to imply with the stupid statement, just admit it.

No everyone doesn't and I wasn't. Just because a portion have read something into it that wasn't there and wasn't meant to be there says more about you and them looking for an argument.

Glaucus · 28 Mar 2015 at 01:01

So again a total meaningless and stupid post. With no merit, but then you try to defend it. even though it means nothing and is clearly crape, however you look at it. By comparing two things you are making a statement. Otherwise there's no point comparing two figures. Just a shame you didn't think about it, and posted some figures that didn't support your position.