Gender is a social construction, there need not be just two.
On topic - Kim Kardashian is repulsive. T Swift is a fox. IMO.
Taylor Evolution Swift 1 - Kim Kardashian 0
- Thread starter [FnG]magnolia
- Start date
Gender is a social construction, there need not be just two.
On topic - Kim Kardashian is repulsive. T Swift is a fox. IMO.
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,860
- Location
- Auckland
Just to add someone else's my 2 cents.
I think KK is pretty rad to the extent that she helps with the whole moon/sun tide pulls so is gravitanionally important to our ecosystem and indeed planet but Tay Tay is musically aligned like some Lawful Good wood elf with a guitar and nice shoes.
Also, not a squat troll.
I think KK is pretty rad to the extent that she helps with the whole moon/sun tide pulls so is gravitanionally important to our ecosystem and indeed planet but Tay Tay is musically aligned like some Lawful Good wood elf with a guitar and nice shoes.
Also, not a squat troll.
Social construction. ie. Male/Female.
You are either one or the other. Hermaphrodites don't count.
Last edited:
Name a third gender please.
The Hijra in India are the most populous, there are between 5 and 6 million of them. Plenty of information for you on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_gender
Edit: Caught your edit
Gender is not Sex, the first is up to everyone and society to define.
Edit: Caught your edit
I have decided that your gender is purple.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,175
The Hijra in India are the most populous, there are between 5 and 6 million of them. Plenty of information for you on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_gender
Edit: Caught your edit
Better than magnolia.
It's the recognition of your souls counterpart in another. The tumescent excitement of indiscretion, ever hanging in the air. Two ships that meet in a stormy sea. The realisation that the path you walk is walked by another.
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2015
- Posts
- 188
Its all down to our obsession of labeling things so that we can understand them better. Problem is, we can only label things within the realm of our own experinces which is pretty limited. It is for this reason that I am going to claim that there are actually 7billion different genders!
As far as this topic goes its all very subjective and in the grand scheme of things does it really matter? Is life going to be better if we can all decide and agree what vacuous celebrity is the most "boneable"?
At the end of the day they all use sex to be successfull, just depends how subtle/un-subtle they are about it. Although there are exceptions to the rule, Ed Sheeran comes to mind!
So in conclusion, they are both as atractive as each other in this current space in time. If they werent attractive then they wouldnt be successfull!
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 647
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,063
- Location
- Bristol UK
Those two guys, haha. BUSTED!
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
Gender is absolutely a construct, but not a social construct. Gender (in the modern sense) was a notion dreamed up by a paedophile with a twisted view of sex and sexuality. Its a complete nonsense. There are men, and there are women. That is it.
Sometimes there are men who are sick and believe themselves women and vice versa. And sometimes there are people born with both sex organs. But these people do not represent a new sex in the same way a person born without their legs does not represent a new species of legless hominids.