Holy crap. What happened in here?! We went from yey equal rights for homosexuals to...actual child abusers now having that right?!
The same arguments are already being used by people who want their "rights" to be recognised.
Whether you or I think something is morally wrong doesn't come into it in the brave new world.
Where did I say I was pro-incest. I said I have a live and let live attitude. What two consenting adults get up to isn't my concern.
Homosexuality is legal, paedophilia isn't and will never be for obvious reasons.
Incest indifferent?
I'm sure someone in the 'backwards 1950s' would say sex with animals would never be legal.
The argument of the ignorant, sex between two consenting adults is completely the same as abusing the trust of a creature or a person who is still developing and doesn't understand what sex is, right?
I'm done here.
The argument is, what is crazy and illegal now, may not always be in the future.
It is a ridiculously stupid argument though, there is a clear difference between consenting adults and an adult and a child who is unable to consent. The fact you think they a similar is quite frankly pathetic.
But who are you to say when a child can consent? As I have said, activists have for a long time being campaigning for the age of consent to be lowered.
Peter Tatchell has spoken of the joy of a friend having sex at the age of 9 with an adult.
Rejecting the argument as being "crazy" isn't any different from me rejecting the idea of "gay marriage" as crazy.
Why can't we ever have a discussion on gay rights without it being derailed into paedophilia? It had no bearing in the debate at all.
There are straight paedophiles, but that never stopped straight marriage.
Your pitiful attempt to hide your hatred and frustrations behind child abuse is not fooling anyone.
I don't think anyone has suggested conflating homosexuals with paedophiles.
The point being made is that the same arguments in favour of "gay rights" are also valid when talking about the rights of other sexual minorities.
I don't think anyone has suggested conflating homosexuals with paedophiles.
The point being made is that the same arguments in favour of "gay rights" are also valid when talking about the rights of other sexual minorities.
Homosexuality isn't illegal, paedophilia is. End of discussion.
Care to actually argue against the point being made then?
Age of consent also should be 13 i think.
The point being made is that the same arguments in favour of "gay rights" are also valid when talking about the rights of other sexual minorities.