Ireland votes on gay marriage - why should I care?

No one had down and out said it. But every we have a thread on gay rights, peadophillia is brought up. Why always child abuse?

If you want to make comparisons, use something comparable. Something that, like that marriage, is between consenting adults.

The reason why it gets brought up is because it is a sexual orientation that many people believe is morally wrong. Homosexual acts were illegal until relatively recently. The only argument that people can raise to support this different expression of human sexuality being treated differently is one of consent.

Up until recently the age of consent for homosexual acts was 21. That has been dropped. Already campaigners want to see it dropped even further. If, as Efour suggests, it gets dropped to 13 then the consent thing slips further out of the picture. If it gets dropped to 13 why not drop it further. As I said already, Peter Tatchell speaks of the "joy" his friend experienced at the age of 9 having sex with an adult.

I have yet to read a single argument from anyone as to why gay rights are OK but paedophile rights are not. It just strikes me as paedophobic and bigoted.
 
Last edited:
If it gets dropped to 13 why not drop it further. As I said already, Peter Tatchell speaks of the "joy" his friend experienced at the age of 9 having sex with an adult.

I don't think less than 13 is remotely possible and its deffo bordering on weird side then. Most Euro countries are between 13-16 maybe in the middle then ?

14-15 ?

I cant imagine what its like to be a kid these days. I assume with the Internet you are probably exposed to the world and all its weirdness by a disturbingly young age.
 
I don't think less than 13 is remotely possible and its deffo bordering on weird side then. Most Euro countries are between 13-16 maybe in the middle then ?

14-15 ?

I cant imagine what its like to be a kid these days. I assume with the Internet you are probably exposed to the world and all its weirdness by a disturbingly young age.

You calling it weird is just you projecting your own view of morality on others though? Why should your views on this be able to get in the way of the happiness of others?

If you don't believe in sex with 12 year olds, then don't have sex with a 12 year old.

You see how the same arguments can be used?
 
You calling it weird is just you projecting your own view of morality on others though? Why should your views on this be able to get in the way of the happiness of others?

If you don't believe in sex with 12 year olds, then don't have sex with a 12 year old.

You see how the same arguments can be used?

Yeah i already supported you mate if you want to read instead of jumping down throats. Dont bite me... This is how the age of consent thing got into the whole sidetrack nonsense and its unrelated.

You're probably having a bad day too like me, benefit of the doubt.
 
Age of consent also should be 13 i think.

Are you sexually attracted to 13 year old children ?

No ? why ?

Don't play dumb with me and everyone else here. You think the age of consent should be lowered to 13. This implies you'd have no problem having sex with a 13 year old yourself if that age of consent was lowered. Most 13 year olds are not mature enough to be in a sexual relationship. Most 16 year olds struggle with it to be honest.

Disgusting. :mad:
 
You're not making any points, you're just showing classical signs of psychological repression. In example, your obsession to link homosexuality to pedophilia is not rational so it can be explained by repressed thoughts/insticts which lie deep in your subconscious.

This is common among homophobes so you're nothing special.

He made a very good point. You're just showing classical signs of reading too many pseudoscientific psychology books. If the mind was so simple we could understand it, we would be to simple to understand it. I don't see him showing any irrational fears to be called a homophobe. The link is that both sexual desires were illegal, with one becoming legal and the other has activists to make it legal. Boys being the biggest victims of paedophilia is another topic.
 
Don't play dumb with me and everyone else here. You think the age of consent should be lowered to 13. This implies you'd have no problem having sex with a 13 year old yourself if that age of consent was lowered. Most 13 year olds are not mature enough to be in a sexual relationship. Most 16 year olds struggle with it to be honest.

Disgusting. :mad:

Im guessing you are still majorly butt hurt from the other thread so i'm going to let it slip.

I know you have physiological issues so ill just assume its that doing the typing.

Ill report the post let a mod decide like last time.

The age of consent for a lot of euro zone countries is 13/14. You just called half of Europe pedophiles?
Is that the opinion of a normal person ?
You see 9 million Swedish people as pedophiles? As there A.O.C is 15 after all ?
 
Last edited:
Yeah i already supported you mate if you want to read instead of jumping down throats. Dont bite me... This is how the age of consent thing got into the whole sidetrack nonsense and its unrelated.

You're probably having a bad day too like me, benefit of the doubt.

I wasn't jumping down your throat. Sorry if it came across that way.

I was just making the point the argument against it is based on subjective morality. I agree that the idea of a child having sex is weird.

From there I just followed the argument along....
 
Im guessing you are still majorly butt hurt from the other thread so i'm going to let it slip.

I know you have physiological issues so ill just assume its that doing the typing.

Ill report the post let a mod decide like last time.

I don't have Physiological issues, what the hell are you trolling me about that for ?

In the last thread you refer to it was one of your disgusting posts that was deleted, mine are all still there. So the 'butt hurt' must be yours.

Report my post. I haven't broke any forum rules. You've consistently broke every moral rule in the book though.
 
The age of consent is there to protect young people from doing things that they will later regret.

A 12 year old is a lot more likely to be manipulated by an adult into doing something they don't really want to do than a 16 year old is.

Which is why although the age of consent is 16, the police only get involved if someone over 16 had sex with someone under 16.

This is very different to consenting adults having homosexual sex, and you can't apply the same arguments.

The laws against homosexuality were there to protect people. Society has changed, there is no reason it won't change with regards to paedophilia. As has been stated, there is already support from prominent "progressives" to lower the age of consent.
 
Can we just get this clear If the age of consent is 13 does that mean all People over the age of 18/21 (adults) want to have sex with teenagers?????

How do you even come to that conclusion without having "mental problems?"
 
Can we just get this clear If the age of consent is 13 does that mean all People over the age of 18/21 (adults) want to have sex with teenagers?????

How do you even come to that conclusion without having "mental problems?"

Can we just get this clear, why do you think the age of consent should be lowered to 13 ? How do you even come to that conclusion without having 'mental problems ?'
 
Report my post. I haven't broke any forum rules. You've consistently broke every moral rule in the book though.

So, im probably typing too fast for the posts to go in the right order, The forums hot hot hot.

All Swedes have moral issues, because they can joke about death, Very open about gay rights (most of them) and have an age of consent of 15...

im bored :(
 
Last edited:
Can we just get this clear, why do you think the age of consent should be lowered to 13 ? How do you even come to that conclusion without having 'mental problems ?'

Yeah sure read my previous post i think its all there. (#245)

Without mental problems its easy. :D

Answer mine please -

edit - LOL - i just saw i corrected psychological to physiological no wonder its was confusing.
Anyway its irrelevant .
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom