Can't see why not. Disabled passengers are allowed on planes, why not crew?
Are you actually serious?
Can't see why not. Disabled passengers are allowed on planes, why not crew?
I think the term stewardess has been replaced by a more PC one now. But for reference it's unlikely, she would have higher than normal difficulty in maintaining balance during turbulence and pushing the refreshments cart (though a head stewardess wouldn't be doing that anyway if that was the job she was going for).
However at the end of the day she would be a liability in an emergency not a asset so any flight company could legally blacklist her, and I would assume most would simply due to the fact that by employing her they could open themselves up to claims in the future and their insurance wouldn't like it.
Are you actually serious?
My housemate isn't allowed to sit in the seats next to the emergency exits on planes because he's so tall and generally built like a giant that they class him as an obstruction, we're not talking obese just one of those people naturally built like a mountain. So I imagine someone without full control of one of their limbs would be treated in the same way.
Can't see why not. Disabled passengers are allowed on planes, why not crew?
I think it's quite harsh to call someone missing a leg an obstruction. Provided they have one of the excellent modern prosthetics they should be no hinderance at all. These things don't tend to just drop off! Not to my knowledge any way.
People are going on as if this girls life is over. It is not. Yes, she will face difficulties, there will be some very hard times but her life is by no means over or ruined.
Amputees have reached the poles. Scaled Everest.
She should get the best treatment available, physically and psychologically. She should be compensated within reason for the trauma. She should have any prosthetics and home adaptions for the future paid for.
What she shouldn't be though is ' set for life' . She won't need round the clock care until her death. She won't be a burden on her family and friends. She will be a member of society just like any one of us and should be able to support herself just like any one of us.
The fact she has lost her leg above the knee makes prosthesis a lot more difficult.
She deserves every penny she gets - I hope it's well into 7 figures.
I think it's quite harsh to call someone missing a leg an obstruction. Provided they have one of the excellent modern prosthetics they should be no hinderance at all. These things don't tend to just drop off! Not to my knowledge any way.
People are going on as if this girls life is over. It is not. Yes, she will face difficulties, there will be some very hard times but her life is by no means over or ruined.
Amputees have reached the poles. Scaled Everest.
She should get the best treatment available, physically and psychologically. She should be compensated within reason for the trauma. She should have any prosthetics and home adaptions for the future paid for.
What she shouldn't be though is ' set for life' . She won't need round the clock care until her death. She won't be a burden on her family and friends. She will be a member of society just like any one of us and should be able to support herself just like any one of us.
If I was offered £5,000,000 for half of a leg I think I'd rather stay "able-bodied" to be honest.
The military class loss of a single leg above the knee as a level 3 injury and is compensated £230,000.
The military class loss of a single leg above the knee as a level 3 injury and is compensated £230,000. Millions would be quite a contrast.